• THIS IS THE 25th ANNIVERSARY YEAR FOR THE LES PAUL FORUM! PLEASE CELEBRATE WITH US AND SUPPORT US WITH A DONATION TO KEEP US GOING! We've made a large financial investment to convert the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and now have to move to a new host. We also have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!
  • WE ARE MOVING THE LES PAUL FORUM TO A NEW HOSTING PROVIDER OVER THE NEXT 5-10 DAYS. We will experience downtime during that period. Please be patient and have confidence that we will return! Many thanks, Mike Slubowski, Admin

True Historic ´59 Bavarian Makeover

hoss

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
6,748
I Used a TH guitar because I wanted it to be as close to an original as possible. A regular Standard Historic has the wrong shape on the cutaway and the big cavity for starters.
Also the TH guitars have much better mahogny.
Thank's I did not know that. I left the "Historic market" in 2012 and the new model lines totally confuse me.
 

GastonG

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 25, 2001
Messages
1,397
I Used a TH guitar because I wanted it to be as close to an original as possible. A regular Standard Historic has the wrong shape on the cutaway and the big cavity for starters.
Also the TH guitars have much better mahogny.

Orreman, quite a project and your reissue looks fantastic now ! Magnificient job by this Master Luthier.

Just want to point out that a True Historic LP also have a wrong shape on the cutaway (too thin). When I first saw a TH for the first time last year, this (the cutaway) is what I noticed being "wrong" at first sight. The standard Historic's cutaway is beefier like an original but less pointy.

Gaston :salude
 

DoubleBoogie

Well-known member
Joined
Jun 6, 2004
Messages
4,800
:dude::dude::dude: Congratulations Orreman! That thing is just spectacular in my book! I really enjoyed this thread and seeing the progress. Thanks for sharing it with us. I look forward to the videos too. :hank:salude
 

djcmusician

Active member
Joined
Apr 29, 2015
Messages
263
Curious about the plastics. Truss Rod Cover, back plates, poker chip, switch tip, PG, Rings, Output jack plate. Are these all from the TH, or have they been changed?
 

Orreman

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
147
Orreman, quite a project and your reissue looks fantastic now ! Magnificient job by this Master Luthier.

Just want to point out that a True Historic LP also have a wrong shape on the cutaway (too thin). When I first saw a TH for the first time last year, this (the cutaway) is what I noticed being "wrong" at first sight. The standard Historic's cutaway is beefier like an original but less pointy.

Gaston :salude
Sorry man, but you couldn't be more wrong. I know for a fact that Edvin Wilson and the guys at Gibson CS measured many originals to get the shape right on the TH series.
The difference between a TH and a standard historic is that the cutaway is deeper on the TH.

Here are some pictures:

My TH:
lwslPbs.jpg


An original '59 Burst:
9yylTZF.jpg


As you can see, the shape is pretty much identical.
 

Orreman

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
147
Curious about the plastics. Truss Rod Cover, back plates, poker chip, switch tip, PG, Rings, Output jack plate. Are these all from the TH, or have they been changed?

Here's a (pretty) complete list:

- Pickguard: Original True Historic
- Pickup rings: DMC Ver. 2, Aged
- Pickups: Area 59 P.A.F limited double whites, aged
- Pickup Covers: Original True Historic. Aged by Mr. Jäger
- Switch tip: DMC, aged
- Switch Ring: Montreux Time Machine, aged
- ABR-1: Art Of Aging. Burst shaped.
- Tailpiece: DMC, Aged
- Tuners: Kluson w. Aged DMC tips
- Trussrod Cover: Wizz, rolled and aged.
- Knobs: DMC, aged
- Input jack plate: Montreux Time Machine, aged
- Studs: Montreux Time Machine, aged and Cryo treated.
 

marshall1987

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
3,278
Here's a (pretty) complete list:

- Pickguard: Original True Historic
- Pickup rings: DMC Ver. 2, Aged
- Pickups: Area 59 P.A.F limited double whites, aged
- Pickup Covers: Original True Historic. Aged by Mr. Jäger
- Switch tip: DMC, aged
- Switch Ring: Montreux Time Machine, aged
- ABR-1: Art Of Aging. Burst shaped.
- Tailpiece: DMC, Aged
- Tuners: Kluson w. Aged DMC tips
- Trussrod Cover: Wizz, rolled and aged.
- Knobs: DMC, aged
- Input jack plate: Montreux Time Machine, aged
- Studs: Montreux Time Machine, aged and Cryo treated.

This list of changed and/or "upgraded" plastics and hardware suggests that the Les Paul True Historic equivalent parts, which Gibson spent so much time and expense on getting right, were not up to your or Florian's standards. Doesn't say much for the True Historic Les Paul line.
 

GastonG

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 25, 2001
Messages
1,397
Sorry man, but you couldn't be more wrong. I know for a fact that Edvin Wilson and the guys at Gibson CS measured many originals to get the shape right on the TH series.
The difference between a TH and a standard historic is that the cutaway is deeper on the TH.

As you can see, the shape is pretty much identical.

pretty much identical ???? Nope !
Just look at this old burst of mine:
Nicky%20in%201981_zpscqhecuud.jpg~original


If you find the TH cutaway close to this, then you're right and I'm wrong ! but you can ask Mike Slub, Tom W., Charles D. or any burst owner here, and if I'm wrong, I'll be at the crossroad...

or that one ?
PearlyGatesCenterfold_zpsnshakk7n.jpg~original
 
Last edited:

CAGinLA

Active member
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
489
This list of changed and/or "upgraded" plastics and hardware suggests that the Les Paul True Historic equivalent parts, which Gibson spent so much time and expense on getting right, were not up to your or Florian's standards. Doesn't say much for the True Historic Les Paul line.

All it says about the TH line is that it doesn't come with the specific aging that Orreman wanted for this particular guitar.

Why do so many people on message boards suffer from True Historic Derangement Syndrome? They're great guitars!
 

marshall1987

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
3,278
All it says about the TH line is that it doesn't come with the specific aging that Orreman wanted for this particular guitar.

Why do so many people on message boards suffer from True Historic Derangement Syndrome? They're great guitars!


:bigal are you talking about.

I don't own a True Historic and have never even seen one in person. I'm just curious why all the original plastics were changed for aftermarket equivalents? Orreman must have had his reasons. Florian could just have easily aged the True Historic plastics and other parts if he chose to do so.

Derangement Syndrome? Get a grip. Hah! Suggest you lay off the Starbucks while on message boards.:teeth
 

Orreman

New member
Joined
Jun 20, 2015
Messages
147
pretty much identical ???? Nope !
Just look at this old burst of mine:
Nicky%20in%201981_zpscqhecuud.jpg~original


If you find the TH cutaway close to this, then you're right and I'm wrong ! but you can ask Mike Slub, Tom W., Charles D. or any burst owner here, and if I'm wrong, I'll be at the crossroad...

or that one ?
PearlyGatesCenterfold_zpsnshakk7n.jpg~original

Hey! I clearly see the difference! Sorry. This means that once again Gibson is full of s%&t.
 

CAGinLA

Active member
Joined
Jan 4, 2016
Messages
489
[/COLOR]

:bigal are you talking about.

I don't own a True Historic and have never even seen one in person. I'm just curious why all the original plastics were changed for aftermarket equivalents? Orreman must have had his reasons. Florian could just have easily aged the True Historic plastics and other parts if he chose to do so.

Derangement Syndrome? Get a grip. Hah! Suggest you lay off the Starbucks while on message boards.:teeth

I suggest you re-read your previous post - pretty much a classic example of concern trolling and THDS.
 

sws1

Well-known member
Joined
Dec 4, 2001
Messages
2,850
Hey! I clearly see the difference! Sorry. This means that once again Gibson is full of s%&t.

Funny. I own both old and new LPs, and for the life of me, I can't see the difference. I believe Gaston when it says it's different, by my eyes simply don't see it. And part of me doesn't want to see it, for fear that I'll notice it all the time now.
 

RavenTooth

Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2016
Messages
56
It seems like the original cutouts are deeper so there is less maple top visible between the top of the pick guard and the binding.
 

J.D.

Well-known member
Joined
May 24, 2006
Messages
10,037
Geez, guys, relax. This guitar is incredible and exactly built as the OP wants. He was kind enough to share it. No need to nit pick. It was and still is a reissue, not a '50s Burst or exact replica.
 

hoss

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 1, 2004
Messages
6,748
It seems like the original cutouts are deeper so there is less maple top visible between the top of the pick guard and the binding.
This or the angle of the camera lens to the top of the guitar.
 

asapmaz

Active member
Joined
Jun 19, 2003
Messages
304
It seems like the original cutouts are deeper so there is less maple top visible between the top of the pick guard and the binding.

Deeper and wider. I've been saying the same thing for so long. Gibson hasn't gotten the cutaway right in any reissue, ever.
 

marshall1987

Well-known member
Joined
Jan 30, 2005
Messages
3,278
I suggest you re-read your previous post - pretty much a classic example of concern trolling and THDS.

Hey pal.....I don't know what your agenda is. But if it is to stir up shit on this thread, you have succeeded. You need to hit the pause button, and take a deep breath. And pull your head out of your arse.
 
Top