Eric Stewart's Les Paul 'Custom'

Big Al said:

Tom, it was the original ebay listing and the descripton of the guitar, which is no longer for sale, found by clicking the see original listing link. Posting my opinion regarding the guitar which was linked to the ebay listing in the op nor my opinion of the description of that guitar in the listing and subject of the thread is what has been done on countless similar threads.

I named no one, I did not post a link and I will not delete my post. I still fail to see how any of this is spam as nothing is for sale or being offered and every ebay listing has multiple other items offered by multiple sellers just like the ones appearing on the page linked in the op, none of which were discussed in this thread.

Click to expand...

The link inside the quote on your post #10 is still there. It has nothing to do with eBay. It is titled 'happy wheels'. I can see it right now.
Again, nothing to do with eBay.

AND, I did not suggest you delete your post. Just edit out the offensive link.
Please go back to post #10. If you don't clearly see it. I can't explain it. It is still showing on my computer. :wah

Tom Wittrock said:

The link inside the quote on your post #10 is still there. It has nothing to do with eBay. It is titled 'happy wheels'. I can see it right now.
Again, nothing to do with eBay.

AND, I did not suggest you delete your post. Just edit out the offensive link.
Please go back to post #10. If you don't clearly see it. I can't explain it. It is still showing on my computer. :wah

Click to expand...

My one track mind was on the thread topic and I thought the quote was in reference to the odd discription quotes I used in my reply. Never even considering the actual Reply with Quote I used for context and the link within!

I could not understand where the spam was as I thought it was my post, not the nimrod I replied to. Doh!! Removed link.

Big Al said:

My one track mind was on the thread topic and I thought the quote was in reference to the odd discription quotes I used in my reply. Never even considering the actual Reply with Quote I used for context and the link within!

I could not understand where the spam was as I thought it was my post, not the nimrod I replied to. Doh!! Removed link.

Click to expand...

I know it was confusing. Thanks for looking again. :salude

richard henry said:

Click to expand...

At first glance i kinda hated this guitar, but the more i look at it, the more im interested in it, a lp with a custom headstock with rosewood fret board and trapezoid inlays with binding on only the front of the body, this is crazy cool!! Thanks for sharing!!!

We have to take it on faith that it's a 54 that's been modded, at this point. But the single ply binding, on the front only, rosewood FB and trap inlays all fit with that. I have to think that the headstock is grafted on. There's no "3rd pickup" (don't know where the seller got the idea there should be). You can see the routs in one pic for the humbuckers, so it's credible it was born with P90s. The base of the PAF shown looks super clean for a well played guitar, thinking maybe some kind of reissue pickup? And yeah, the tremolo had to be one that required springs on the bottom of the guitar, so Floyd Type seems likely, and there's a whole lot more routing underneath that plastic cover. Since a correct 54 is still less than $30k, and a 53-54 modded to burst specs would be more like $20k, I don't see the value in this guitar. But it's kind of a fun puzzle.

Whats to like ? Really just because it was on stage with a X Beatle ?

If this is a vintage guitar of some sort it really would have very little value IMO If any !

DrRobert said:

We have to take it on faith that it's a 54 that's been modded, at this point. But the single ply binding, on the front only, rosewood FB and trap inlays all fit with that. I have to think that the headstock is grafted on.

Click to expand...

Really? Does this not look like the exact same neck on this pointy horned 70's Les Paul in the hands of his fellow band member?