• Guys, we've spent considerable money converting the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and we have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!

Will a refret effect the value of a vintage LP ?

doublestop

New member
Joined
Feb 18, 2002
Messages
119
Experts,

I have a '56 Jr that I love but...I would like to have bigger frets and am considering a refret.

Will this hurt the resale value? At this moment the original frets are on it.

Thanks,

Peter
 

Rich R

In the Zone/Backstage Pass
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
4,999
I'm sure opinions will be severely divided on this one. My opinion is that a PROFESSIONAL refret doesn't hurt value much at all. It certainly doesn't stop ME from considering a guitar for purchase. In the case of the Black Beauties, many of these guitars have been re-fretted to adapt them to contemporary tastes, and it has had a trivial effect on values.

In terms of Bursts, if I was buying a factory larger fret model, I would prefer to have one with the original frets, so long as they are in good shape. The reason is that I have a light touch, and my hand sweat is not particularly corrosive, so I can play an original neck and frets for years without causing significant wear. That's why I like my vintage Strat necks as pristine as possible--I don't wear them out, and they stay original.

In terms of my 58 Burst with the smaller frets, if it ever needs a refret, I would have DE refret it with the 59 frets, and not give it a second thought.
 

sunburst1

Active member
Joined
Sep 3, 2002
Messages
3,989
It depends on alot of factors. Is the Jr. in player or collector cond. ? What do you do with it: play out in a band or only in house use? Bottom line is it's your guitar do what you want to it. As far as killing the value unless it was near mint I wouldn't worry about a refet, yes it dose derease the value , but only 10-15% IMO. You can't play a guitar with shity dented , flat frets.:hippy
 

DrRobert

Les Paul Forum Member
Joined
Jun 12, 2003
Messages
6,050
If you're thinking eventual collector value, it really depends on how long you're thinking of keeping it, too. In the short term, there're still good playing 50s Gibsons with original frets, but eventually they're all gonna need refrets unless they're purely case queens. As time goes on I suspect (and Gruhn agrees FWIW) that a refret will have less and less effect on the value of a guitar that's being played, till eventually it won't matter... As to whether you should use vintage correct wire (small in the case of your 56) that might have more of an effect later (wrong wire is an obvious mod) but I suppose if it's a question of thousands of dollars in 20 years time, you could have it refretted for sale with the correct wire. I'd go with what plays well for you (and yes, I did have my 58 Custom refretted with vintage 59 sized wire so that I can play my style on it-course it's a player not a collector for other reasons).
 

Mike Shaw

Active member
Joined
Jul 31, 2001
Messages
2,883
I agree, make it play the way you like. I'm not too sure a refret will drop it's value if it's a top notch job. Of course, if you put huge bass frets on a guitar that is known for small frets, that could turn some people away! As a matter of fact, a lot of people like a little bigger fret on early Gibsons so it could be a plus.
 

loverocker

New member
Joined
Apr 18, 2003
Messages
1,862
I've never tried selling a vintage guitar, but I'll bet there are at least some non-playing collectors who would pay extra $$$ for a guitar with unplayably worn original frets compared to a perfect refret.

This goes double for any guitar played by someone famous, natch.

But for the rest of the potential market, a refret is OK, and may not harm value at all.
 

fretwire

Active member
Joined
May 21, 2003
Messages
1,427
Save the old frets, as I 've been told, it makes a difference to some buyers???
 

burstin'don

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2001
Messages
671
Definitely affects value...! I would say 10% for whatever guitar .. Also turns off some buyers..If the guitar needs it then do it...Or sell the guitar and buy one with good frets.....But definitely affects price.......
 

Sunburst79

New member
Joined
Oct 28, 2002
Messages
1,190
Save everything! As long as ats a pro refret it Shouldn't be a big deal.

Given the fact its not bound you could conceivably put the original frets back in. (way to much work)

Save'm for the Anal.
 

Rich R

In the Zone/Backstage Pass
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
4,999
Gruhn's got it right (not unusual)--refrets are part and parcel of a quality instrument's life of making music. Would anyone keep playing the original strings?
 

professor

New member
Joined
Jul 22, 2001
Messages
4,889
Lemme see... I'm going to buy a 57 Impala... are the brake linings original?

If they ARE, you can bet your ass I won't be driving it anytime soon...! LOL!

What about guitar strings? Do I want to play on originals that have been on a guitar for 46 years...? Ummm... I don't think so.

I cannot imagine that a guitar that was good enough to have actually been "played" for nearly 50 years would have anything remotely resembling decent frets left on it. I have had all of my vintage pieces -- including a '56 Junior, a '56 LG-2, a '41 L-50, a '51 Epi Zephyr Deluxe Regent, and a '53 ES-175 -- refretted with 6105s, so that I can actually enjoy playing them.

As to whether or not they've been "devalued" now, I really can't say. But I CAN say that they're a hell of a lot more valuable to ME, now that they're actuallly playable...! ;)
 

Shovelhead

Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2001
Messages
420
I had an appraisal done on my '54 a few years back. The guy told me that it had replacement pots in it. I replied that the originals are still in the case, but that they didn't work anymore. He told me that I should put them back in, even if they don't work - that it would make the guitar worth more money. I told him that the guitar's NOT for sale, and I plan on playing it for years to come! The guy just could not understand that. The whole time I was there, he kept muttering that I should put the non-working pots back in it...
 

gmann

Well-known member
Joined
May 26, 2003
Messages
6,178
I have a '56 TV Jr. It had small frets when I got it. They were worn completely out. I had it refretted with larger frets and it is now an amazin' guitar. It's a beater anyway but stock except for the frets. George Gruhn doesn't seem to think it is a big deal. I know some guys will always insist on 100% orig. and that's fine for them I think. IMO, ya gotta be able to play it ya know?
 

AXE752

New member
Joined
Mar 11, 2002
Messages
812
A guitar is meant to be played. To be played it's got to be playable. . . . . 'nuff sed.

One man's opinion.


As for the original question of whether value is affected: I think it depends on the buyer--for some yes and for some no, and I think that the no's will become more prevalent as time goes by. The only exceptions to this may be the "museum pieces" that don't get played--not much danger for fret wear on these, though.
 
Last edited:

burstin'don

Member
Joined
Nov 19, 2001
Messages
671
gmann said:
I have a '56 TV Jr. It had small frets when I got it. They were worn completely out. I had it refretted with larger frets and it is now an amazin' guitar. It's a beater anyway but stock except for the frets. George Gruhn doesn't seem to think it is a big deal. I know some guys will always insist on 100% orig. and that's fine for them I think. IMO, ya gotta be able to play it ya know?

Hi Gman I guess Geoge was selling you a guitar. See what his opinion would be if you are selling him a guitar...Like all dealers he has two faces...
 

585960

Active member
Joined
Apr 5, 2002
Messages
1,987
I don't think that a refret, done pro, would hurt a thing. Sure, origiinal frets w/life on them is nice, but would it stop you from buying that certain guitar? I doubt it. And the 10% rule, will soon fade away. Its inevitable that one day, if its going to be played, its going to be refretted.
 

eddie101

New member
Joined
Dec 19, 2002
Messages
1,904
professor said:
Lemme see... I'm going to buy a 57 Impala... are the brake linings original?

If they ARE, you can bet your ass I won't be driving it anytime soon...! LOL!

As to whether or not they've been "devalued" now, I really can't say. But I CAN say that they're a hell of a lot more valuable to ME, now that they're actuallly playable...! ;)


As always, good analogy there Prof :lol

Btw, what amp(s) are you using/playing now? Still using Turbo pup?

I don't mean to highjack the thread.
 

Matt3

New member
Joined
Jan 13, 2003
Messages
919
If I was buying one, I would probably TRY to get the price down using any arguement I could. If the guitar has been refretted, then I would probably TRY to get the price down using that as an excuse. I tend to agree that frets are a wear item and need to be replaced from time to time.

I guess I'm just trying to point out that just because a collector says the value has been decreased by a refret, that doesn't make it so. He may be feeding you a line of BS just to get the price down. I would venture a guess that when the collector tries to sell that same guitar, then the refret is no big deal.

Or maybe I'm just a cynic.;)

Matt
 

Litcrit

New member
Joined
May 9, 2002
Messages
5,990
One good thing about Fenders: you can avoid this whole issue by putting on a NEW REISSUE NECK. Save the original for when you sell it. That's what my vintage playing buddies do. Difference in tone? Slight, but they still get to enjoy their 50's guitars with nice new frets.
 
Top