• THIS IS THE 25th ANNIVERSARY YEAR FOR THE LES PAUL FORUM! PLEASE CELEBRATE WITH US AND SUPPORT US WITH A DONATION TO KEEP US GOING! We've made a large financial investment to convert the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and now have to move to a new host. We also have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!
  • WE ARE MOVING THE LES PAUL FORUM TO A NEW HOSTING PROVIDER OVER THE NEXT 5-10 DAYS. We will experience downtime during that period. Please be patient and have confidence that we will return! Many thanks, Mike Slubowski, Admin

Marshall JTM60?

TBR623

Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2001
Messages
555
I had one too...I was very disappointed. I spent more time trying to find ANYTHING that sounded good.Chainsaw distortion-IMO,its not a good example of Marshall amplification.Sold it for $250 and was happy.
 

59Vampire

Active member
Joined
Feb 1, 2005
Messages
4,223
i had the jtm 312 which had 5881s converted it to el34s and NEVER had an issue, the clean channel roared! it sounded killer with a ts808. it was a good one i guess. ended up selling it to the Zendrive creator when i had my 18 watt built.
 

Kage

New member
Joined
Jun 26, 2005
Messages
133
The clean channel was nice, but to get it clean you had to turn the master down and then you couldn't get the channel volumes balanced.
Interesting, my experience has been the opposite. When I was running the channel volumes up around 12 o'clock and the master the same I was finding the clean channel breaking up a lot. Since I've starting running the master up past 3 o'clock with the channels down around 9 I've found the clean channel to run much cleaner than before with more overall volume. Certainly not Fender clean but it doesn't seem to break up as much this way.
 

dwagar

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 18, 2005
Messages
4,459
an old thread, but that's what happens when you procrastinate as much as I do. The old JTM60 finally came up on the 'what can I mess with now' list.

LP20th, fantastic mod man. Your pic over on the Metro forum was exactly what I needed.

Cutting the diodes out makes this amp sound great IMO. I've only tried it at house volumes so far, but I'll drag it over to a practice one of these days and crank it up. I always hated the buzz saw on the gain channel.

Again, thanks!
 

keef

Active member
Joined
Jan 27, 2002
Messages
5,006
Never played one of these, but I recall a big amp shoot out in GP where the JTM 60 was among the winners. The 602 had a great review in Guitarist magazine. Now I read about decent or even sucky tone.

I hear ya - ads bought by Marshall...?
 

Dega500

New member
Joined
May 24, 2006
Messages
70
Hey guys,

How about a link to the pic on the "Metro Forum"?

I've been interested in trying that mod for years.

Thanks,

Mike
 

Kage

New member
Joined
Jun 26, 2005
Messages
133
I don't think it has sucky tone. Mostly just a matter of taste.
 

zombiwoof

Active member
Joined
Feb 22, 2003
Messages
3,565
When you remove the clipping diodes on a Marshall that has them, do you have to do other circuit mods to compensate for their removal? Do you still have overdrive when you choose the lead mode?

Al
 

lp20th

New member
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
83
With this mod you add a resistor in place of the diodes. This completes the feedback loop. One other point, it appears there were two versions of the clipping diode circuit in the JTM60 from the schematics I have seen. The first, like mine, has the diodes feeding back to the previous tube stage and the 2nd where the diodes are tied to ground. The mod I did adding the resistor applies to the feedback version.

You still have overdrive with this mod, not nearly as much, but its all tube overdrive.

Here is the link. Look for my user name and you will see an attached image.

http://forum.metroamp.com/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=13499&p=235196&hilit=jtm60#p235196

lp20th
 
Top