hoss
Well-known member
- Joined
- Aug 1, 2004
- Messages
- 6,748
Off or shadows?They are.
Off or shadows?They are.
I've had reason to secure expert legal opinion on this question recently, PM me if concerned.
Off or shadows?
I may be just imagining this (because I'd REALLY like to believe as well), but does it look like Beano didn't have the face plate washers installed to anyone else? I know this is a long shot, but if so, that would explain the absence of the marks from them on the face of the headstock of 0 2183.Except ... I don't see evidence of Grovers on 0 2183. You decide.
I want to believe!
..But the inlays aren't matching up.
I think you could be right about the front of the headstock.
Now, what about the back of the headstock?
Like many others, I have owned guitars that originally had the factory Klusons changed to Grovers (so obviously know what that looks like), but what about changing back to the original Klusons - what holes/evidence would that leave, and if there would be visible holes, can they be repaired well?
Wouldn't any marks the Grovers would leave on the back be covered by the Klusons, if put back on?
I want to believe!
..But the inlays aren't matching up.
Statute of limitations, I believe.