Cheburashka
New member
- Joined
- Jul 8, 2005
- Messages
- 585
donGrafico said:I get your drift. So, according to your "facts", everyone in Michigan is a gun-toting NAZI and everyone in Tennessee is a self-absorbed, gass-bag tree-hugger, then even though the original question was: "is there any difference in the quality of the guitars from each plant", the real question is: "would you rather buy a guitar from this guy,
or this guy?".
Who knew guitars could be so political?
Nah. Elfin painted Michigan people as industrious and hard-working, and southern people as poor white trash. I put a different spin on it. If I wanted to take it farther, I'd post a picture of Flint Michigan today. It looks like the Moon, except with garbage.
The fact is that there are lots of racists and gun nuts throughout the US. Personally, I prefer Gore to Nugent though: They're both politicians these days, only Gore is a pro, and Nugent is a rabid jingoist who has no understanding of complex world issues. In terms of guitar playing, I remember Nugent's little "guitar showoff" competitions where he'd try to humiliate local talent. I remember a particular occasion where a quiet kid from Memphis, by the name of Shawn Lane, went up on stage and totally creamed him. It looked good on the idiot.
But back to the Nashville/Kalamazoo question: Both are good, but I prefer a Nashville for the updated hardware and fact that in this modern age, Gibson cuts up seconds rather than selling them. It's not a factory preference, but a times and policy preference.