G650
Member
- Joined
- Nov 28, 2022
- Messages
- 70
Maybe you know something I don't, but that seems a rather bold accusation. And four people liking that post - I don't get that.
Yeah, seems pretty uncalled for and just frankly mean to me.
Maybe you know something I don't, but that seems a rather bold accusation. And four people liking that post - I don't get that.
While you're right on, I've bought "fake stuff" that ended up being real. Anything can happen.
Are you a Pressman ?Thats because the gold lettering is silkscreened onto a black rectangle. Any movement changes the position of the lettering on the black field. In printers terms, the alignment of the colors is called "registration" of the colors. The PAF decal is tthree "colors" clear decal material, black, gold. No the decals arent trimmed from a sheet of "decal paper" like most modern decal repros printed in laserjet or inkjet printers
That's the way it sounded to me .I will add, having worked on Denmark St, that the calibre of ‘expert’ there who would genuinely know about such things is embarrassing, and it’s be the last place I’d go have PAFs authenticated….if I needed such help.
The fact is the tech didn’t immediately dismiss these as garden variety Classic ‘57s speaks volumes, of either complete ineptitude or extreme politeness!
I’ve been in graphics for 40 yearsAre you a Pressman ?
You remind me of my old boss . God Bless Him as I drove him nuts .I’ve been in graphics for 40 years
Start a thread about this one in the "Other Gibsons" pub!please see the pics of my favorite guitar
A 1939 Recording King MK5 made by Gibson for Montgomery Ward
enjoy
View attachment 21593 View attachment 21594
Well... with your deletions of posts (from a long standing member with a wealth of invaluable knowledge), now (totally new) member windys post #12 and (some of ) post #24 is somewhat out of context, don't you think? Shouldn't these 2 posts be nuked as well?Guys, I deleted several of your posts. Sorry, but IMHO you went way over the top in response to the OP. I did receive some concerns from other members.
No.Well... with your deletions of posts (from a long standing member with a wealth of invaluable knowledge), now (totally new) member windys post #12 and (some of ) post #24 is somewhat out of context, don't you think? Shouldn't these 2 posts be nuked as well?