paul kossoff
New member
- Joined
- Sep 1, 2003
- Messages
- 67
Why are all the old goldtops i see such as the one on this thread have checking Diagonally ..while much of the new ones like mine checking vertically !! ....?
Why are all the old goldtops i see such as the one on this thread have checking Diagonally ..while much of the new ones like mine checking vertically !! ....?
That seems to be a common problem for goldtops in that area.
I remember the complaints 10/12 years ago (I was one of them) about the super thick plastic 'nitro' Gibson were using. The finish on my standard was still soft after 18 months. Nasty great smelling stuff. Now it looks like they have cut down on plasticiser and spraying it thinner and having the problems associated with that. I'd prefer the latter. I gave up on my LP and it sat under a bed for 3 years. Then I had it refinished with thin nitro and wow what a difference tonally. It no longer lives under the bed.
I personally would never buy a polyester Gibson.
ewww really? You mean kind of like that three inch layer of goop what they pour all over tables and bars?
I don't see layers of goop on Taylor acoustics or PRS Private Stock guitars.......this comment is insulting to the high end companies that have researched the best thin and durable finishes for our guitars to give the best appearance, longevity and tonal perfection they can possibly attain.
Nitro is an outdated and inadequate finish today.
Everything else in the world has moved on (compare your car to a 1959 model) why not guitar manufacture.
Got photos of the finish problems on your guitars? A lot of talk back & forth, but nobody knows what issues you're encountering or their severity. Maybe it's normal, maybe not.
I've seen lots of photos/videos of fellas playing their Gibsons & Fenders in the 50's, tons of the those guitars started checking at least within the first year. No, you can't really predict it because there are different factors involved. I'm in the camp of "love it" and I mean no offense by that!
You are entitled to 'love the checking/cracking lacquer' if that your thing, however I can only appreciate the 'vintage look' if its on a vintage guitar. If I had wanted 'reliced' I would bought 'reliced".
Also bear in mind that nitro was pretty much the only cheap finish they could use on guitars in the '50's., and probably only used because it was a cheaper alternative to oiling or french polishing. Players you see in the old photos would tour with their guitars and treat them like crap, hence the rapid deterioration.
Heck some of the morons actually smashed them up on stage!!
In the 21st century we should not hark back to the '50's methods for over the counter guitars - maybe on Custom specials, to order only - but use a durable finish that enhances the tone and look of the guitar (like V2, or other UV finish). Nobody complains about Taylor guitar finishes being gloopy or ruining the tone, and they are excellent guitars.
It is probably only the pressure to speed up and cheapen the spraying process by Gibson that has resulted in such a variation in quality and finish durability. Every minute that guitar is hanging on a rack drying costs money.
...
Nitro is an outdated and inadequate finish today.
...
I sent photos to Gibson and my supplying dealer (who referred them to Gibson). Gibsons reply was that it was down to me and finish isn't covered at all. My two guitars were like the Goldtop finish cracking. I don't call it normal for that to happen in only 5 months when the guitars are stored in ideal conditions.........
If Gibson did start using poly lacquer, it would be kept secret by them and disguised by using a made up name for the finish which 'infers' that it may be linked to nitro. Each high end manufacturer that uses some sort of poly finish has its own name for the 'special coating', usually maintaining that it enhances tonality.
Gibson managed to keep the laminated rosewood fretboards secret for years........
ewww really? You mean kind of like that three inch layer of goop what they pour all over tables and bars?
I don't see layers of goop on Taylor acoustics or PRS Private Stock guitars.......this comment is insulting to the high end companies that have researched the best thin and durable finishes for our guitars to give the best appearance, longevity and tonal perfection they can possibly attain.
Nitro is an outdated and inadequate finish today.
Everything else in the world has moved on (compare your car to a 1959 model) why not guitar manufacture.
Wow! Are you all over the place!
In answer to your orange comment I present your red comment! Which infers sub standard practices...
Your yellow comment is just wrong. Everybody knew pretty much when it happened or shortly thereafter, unless you weren't paying attention...
Mr. Purple is written with a typical stupidity of the past so we demonize it. Nitro was and is a fantastic finish and very easy to get a hard shine on. It was used on cars, furniture and instruments for MANY years and fazed out in the 80's for health reasons because it was 'dangerous to spray'. Up until that point many items were still coated by it. It don't sink into metal... Go out and look at your orange peeled car and tell me poly is better.....WHOOPS there's red again!
Why are you saying that checking is a sign of age? With a proper cured nitro, 1 day is enough to achieve finish checking! A guitar doesn't need to be 10 years old to check, only one night!
by your thought process ....we should be seeing GIBSONs hanging in the stores and FINISHED CHECKED ..you can bet if a Gibson starts finish checking at the store, it gets sent back to Gibson...IF a gibson gets sold and the next day the finish checks , the buyer is going to be held responsbile.
Finish checking doesnt mean its not a manufacturing problem....but most common is extreme tempature changes which is totally up to the owner...it can be as simple as sitting on a stand close to a heat register.
Just for the record i have a 38 yr old Gibson with no finish checking , so just because it has nitro does not mean its going to happen, if Gibson is doing a proper job.
There's a lot of arguments/complaints just like yours about Gibson guitars. "The strings catch cause the neck & break angle is too steep" "I can see file marks all over the binding" "The binding isn't flush with the body" "My guitar doesn't check like the old ones" "My guitar started checking, what do I do."
IMO if you don't want that stuff you should look elsewhere. When Gibson modernizes small details consumers complain, when it's not modernized they complain, it's part of the fact most of their guitars were originally designed and built 6+ decades ago.