• THIS IS THE 25th ANNIVERSARY YEAR FOR THE LES PAUL FORUM! PLEASE CELEBRATE WITH US AND SUPPORT US WITH A DONATION TO KEEP US GOING! We've made a large financial investment to convert the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and recently moved to a new hosting platform. We also have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!
  • Please support our Les Paul Forum Sponsors with your business - Gary's Classic Guitars, Wildwood Guitars, Chicago Music Exchange, Reverb.com, Throbak.com and True Vintage Guitar. From personal experience doing business with all of them, they are first class organizations. Thank you!

Rarity of 1961-65 SGs with Bigsbys

crlong

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
63
I've been on the lookout for a nice 63-65 SG Standard (as posted in the WTB section) and wondering what the relative rarity is of an SG Standard with a factory bigsby. I see a handful of images online but I havent found much info on how many were made like this. Any ideas? Wondering if I should keep looking or find a nice one with a regular maestro... thanks for the help.
 

garywright

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
16,201
I have no idea how many were offered with a factory bigsby but I agree on the coolness factor ...I'd like to know how many Mr. Southworth has seen over the years as he's always had plenty of great/clean vintage SGs.:jim
 

crlong

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
63
I agree that one is cool Kris. It just seems really steep considering the headstock break.

And speaking of Gil, what is the best way to get in touch with him? I've tried emailing/voicemails, and would love to pick his brain and see what all he has in the '60s SG department.
 

j45

Active member
Joined
Jun 14, 2002
Messages
9,081
I don't recall ever seeing a 1961 SG with a horseshoe Bigsby although I'm sure it's possible. Although that is a handsome look, make SURE you try before you commit. The string break is non existent and a very poor choice for a tailpiece for an early SG. Most certainly the reason they are so few compared to other models. Because of the early SG's flat top, the strings literally float lightly on top of the ABR-1 and BARELY make contact with saddles on the few I've owned. Really hard to play without lots of frustration and strings CONSTANTLY popping off the bridge. I love the horseshoe/SG look and was suckered into to trying several modded for Bigs early SG's before I got pissed off enough never to own one again. I have to wonder if the neck angle is different on 64 and after with the different neck joints and after because for some reason the break is better than 64 and before.

one of my Bigsby SG's a 1962 model

64SGdallas2.jpg
 
Last edited:

j45

Active member
Joined
Jun 14, 2002
Messages
9,081
re: the ebay guitar above...OMG, $14,500 for a repaired neck break '65 SG? Mint, and unbroken it wouldn't be worth half....I bought the 1962 above for $3000 at the Dallas show in 2006 when vintage prices were at peak. That's a $2000 guitar at best IMO. Geez.....
 

Kris Ford

Active member
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Messages
4,003
re: the ebay guitar above...OMG, $14,500 for a repaired neck break '65 SG? Mint, and unbroken it wouldn't be worth half....I bought the 1962 above for $3000 at the Dallas show in 2006 when vintage prices were at peak. That's a $2000 guitar at best IMO. Geez.....

Agreed, but it was the only postable one I could find at the moment..the price is wack..
 

latestarter

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
4,238
re: the ebay guitar above...OMG, $14,500 for a repaired neck break '65 SG? Mint, and unbroken it wouldn't be worth half....I bought the 1962 above for $3000 at the Dallas show in 2006 when vintage prices were at peak. That's a $2000 guitar at best IMO. Geez.....

if the pickups and all else is original, and it was confirmed a 1 11/16ths nut, I would jump, twice, at $2K. I think that price is a little under cooked, in my view.
 

EdKing

New member
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
359
01bc9039138dc3b4232e47a5c7d0023e.jpg

I have a 64 SG w/ the horse shoe and it has a great break angle. One of the best guitars I own.
The 64 on the right, no Bigsby, has a terrible break angle. It's a monster player. Go figure.
Also...my
Bigsby is WAY closer to the bridge.
 

EdKing

New member
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
359
BTW...on the photo at the top? ...your tune a matic Is backwards. Have the bridge screws facing the pickup. That way the distance from the Bigsby to the bridge isn't impeded.
 

garywright

Well-known member
Joined
Aug 17, 2002
Messages
16,201
01bc9039138dc3b4232e47a5c7d0023e.jpg

I have a 64 SG w/ the horse shoe and it has a great break angle. One of the best guitars I own.
The 64 on the right, no Bigsby, has a terrible break angle. It's a monster player. Go figure.
Also...my
Bigsby is WAY closer to the bridge.

Ed thats one sweet SG ! :salude ...your bigsby is properly mounted ..what happened to the original pickguard ?
 

j45

Active member
Joined
Jun 14, 2002
Messages
9,081
01bc9039138dc3b4232e47a5c7d0023e.jpg

I have a 64 SG w/ the horse shoe and it has a great break angle. One of the best guitars I own.
The 64 on the right, no Bigsby, has a terrible break angle. It's a monster player. Go figure.
Also...my
Bigsby is WAY closer to the bridge.

There you go, that's why I say make sure you try before commit. It was the earlier SG's that I've had break angle issues and strings that sit with so little down pressure on saddles they won't stay in. During 64, in my luck of the draw was the year that things changed most with angle. One of my '64s was a killer player, I've posted clips, and also had the poor break angle but sounded so good I kept it for years. Has anybody researched the neck angles over the years? We have good info on the neck joint changes...somewhere in there must be changes in neck angle when Gibson made those changes. You can see Ed's ABR-1 is adjusted high. Earlier SG's I've owned had ABR-1's virtually flush w/body to compensate for angle....causing the poor string break. I did have a '67 with Bigsby that wouldn't hold strings well but the Bigs was aftermarket and installed low on the body. The best Standards to me were always the Lyre Vibrola models out of all configuration, including Ebony Block.
 

latestarter

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 9, 2009
Messages
4,238
I'll grab a shot of mine this weekend. It has a screaming nickel pat no in the bridge...reading 8.2k, and the Bigsby works fantastic. The neck angle is such that I guess a Maestro wouldn't work for the reasons described here. Although one was on it at some point in time. As was a stop tail.

I'd love a clean 64 with nickel maestro BUT, these Bigsby SGs have a special thing going on.
 

crlong

Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2002
Messages
63
Wow, by the looks of this thread, everyone here seems to have 2 or 3 just lying around.. Awesome photos, keep em comin! (And if anyone has any leads on one, per my wtb post please let me know.)
 

Kris Ford

Active member
Joined
Jan 6, 2007
Messages
4,003
One thing I've noticed in my years of SG research is that the '60's factory Bigsbys used flathead screws FWIW..
 

EdKing

New member
Joined
Feb 6, 2006
Messages
359
Ed thats one sweet SG ! :salude ...your bigsby is properly mounted ..what happened to the original pickguard ?
Long story. By neccesity, I had to install a P90 in the bridge in 75. Messed up the guard. That's the short version. I used this every day from 1970-75. It's probably my favorite guitar, next to my 57 Strat.
 
Top