Jumping@Shadows
Well-known member
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2003
- Messages
- 1,331
No, CT didn't sell it, but he knew of its existence as a questionable guitar for many years but wasn't able to call it
No, CT didn't sell it, but he knew of its existence as a questionable guitar for many years but wasn't able to call it
Yes, that's what the 'provenance' stated
First world problems. You'll get through it my man. Stay strong!! eace2
I can relate to Hoss' response very well. I lost interest in buying vintage guitars after being overwhelmed by the sheer number of fake Fenders in stores and at guitarshows in germany during the late 80's. It really took the fun out of it. When you feel that way it might be a good time for a self imposed moratorium.
I view Fenders differently
I view Fenders differently. Leo himself had no problem using parts that were sitting around for a couple of years into current production. They are basically parts guitars from the start.
yupI view Fenders differently. Leo himself had no problem using parts that were sitting around for a couple of years into current production. They are basically parts guitars from the start.
I view Fenders differently. Leo himself had no problem using parts that were sitting around for a couple of years into current production. They are basically parts guitars from the start.
Yes, but would you pay "original" money for a frankenstrat?
The guitar I was offered in 1986 by Tony Rawlinson was a lemon colour? but the guitar that Wizard sold for £30,000 was a dark cherry burst. I quizzed Murdoch over the Wizard guitar after I had examined it and he told me he got it from someone in the Northeast. The name Tom Lionel Gibson rings a bell?
I have detailed pics of the £30k fake I took when I had it so I might post a pic or two if anyone really cares?
Yes, but would you pay "original" money for a frankenstrat?