hlamp
New member
- Joined
- Oct 26, 2020
- Messages
- 2
I was able to try eight different Custom Shop '59 Reissues in my area, all made in 2019 or 2020. The neck profile on all of these were pretty consistent, except one was noticeably bigger (I think it had more meat on the shoulder). Except for that outlier, I really liked the particular neck profile on these 2019 and 2020 model R9s.
1. If I am looking for an R9 with this particular neck profile, how far back in R9 model years can I go before the neck profile differs from the current models?
In the Year by Year History thread, someone compiled the info into a downloadable file, and I see it says of 2018: "Updated neck profiles: slimmer, with less shoulder".
2. Is there another Les Paul model that has the same neck profile as the current 2019 and 2020 model R9s?
Comparing the R9 to some "Originals" line of Les Pauls I played, the Les Paul Standard 50s feels like a larger neck, and the Les Paul Standard 60s feels like a smaller neck. It's like Goldilocks: I liked the R9 neck in particular. Neck feel is about a bunch of factors, like the depth, the shoulders, how it tapers along the neck. It is hard to capture that researching specs. I understand the value of an R9, but at this point, I'd like a guitar I can toss around or try different pickups in without worrying about originality and value, so it is less appealing that an R9 costs 2.5x what a Les Paul Standard 50s or 60s costs.
3. On Gibson's website, the current Gibson Custom Shop 1959 ES-335 is listed as having an "Authentic '59 Medium C-Shape" neck profile, which is the same neck profile Gibson's website lists for the Custom Shop R9. Are these supposed to be the same neck profiles?
I did have a chance to play a 2020 model Custom Shop 1959 ES-335 earlier this year, and my recollection was it had a much larger neck than the current model R9s I tried out, and it felt more like the neck on the Les Paul Standard 50s in the "Originals" line. (I also recall the Custom Shop ES-335 was a larger neck than the ES-335 Sixties model in the "Originals" line).
4. I own an R7 and an R8, both from 2003. They both have fat, chunky necks. Does anyone know when and how they changed the neck profiles on the R7 and R8 over the years since then?
I rarely play my R7 and R8 because the necks feel very different that the other guitars I have, and I tend to pull out what I'm most familiar or used to and leave the others in the closet. I haven't looked into Les Pauls since I got those two 15 years ago! The current R9s I saw were really interesting because I could see myself going between those and my other guitars a lot more.
1. If I am looking for an R9 with this particular neck profile, how far back in R9 model years can I go before the neck profile differs from the current models?
In the Year by Year History thread, someone compiled the info into a downloadable file, and I see it says of 2018: "Updated neck profiles: slimmer, with less shoulder".
2. Is there another Les Paul model that has the same neck profile as the current 2019 and 2020 model R9s?
Comparing the R9 to some "Originals" line of Les Pauls I played, the Les Paul Standard 50s feels like a larger neck, and the Les Paul Standard 60s feels like a smaller neck. It's like Goldilocks: I liked the R9 neck in particular. Neck feel is about a bunch of factors, like the depth, the shoulders, how it tapers along the neck. It is hard to capture that researching specs. I understand the value of an R9, but at this point, I'd like a guitar I can toss around or try different pickups in without worrying about originality and value, so it is less appealing that an R9 costs 2.5x what a Les Paul Standard 50s or 60s costs.
3. On Gibson's website, the current Gibson Custom Shop 1959 ES-335 is listed as having an "Authentic '59 Medium C-Shape" neck profile, which is the same neck profile Gibson's website lists for the Custom Shop R9. Are these supposed to be the same neck profiles?
I did have a chance to play a 2020 model Custom Shop 1959 ES-335 earlier this year, and my recollection was it had a much larger neck than the current model R9s I tried out, and it felt more like the neck on the Les Paul Standard 50s in the "Originals" line. (I also recall the Custom Shop ES-335 was a larger neck than the ES-335 Sixties model in the "Originals" line).
4. I own an R7 and an R8, both from 2003. They both have fat, chunky necks. Does anyone know when and how they changed the neck profiles on the R7 and R8 over the years since then?
I rarely play my R7 and R8 because the necks feel very different that the other guitars I have, and I tend to pull out what I'm most familiar or used to and leave the others in the closet. I haven't looked into Les Pauls since I got those two 15 years ago! The current R9s I saw were really interesting because I could see myself going between those and my other guitars a lot more.