• Guys, we've spent considerable money converting the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and we have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!

Want to buy a vintage 1950s-60s archtop electric... Gibson vs. Epiphone?

jonnyglock9

New member
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
4
Hi All!

Long time lurker, first post :)

I am in the market for a used vintage archtop electric guitar. I was mostly set on getting an Epiphone Century, early-mid 60s with the wider nut.

Then I started looking at Gibson ES-120/125T as well. Can anyone tell me why the Epiphone would cost more than the Gibson? Same year, same condition. This is what I have been seeing for the most part.

It seems a bit odd to me, as Gibsons tend to cost more than Epis at pretty much every other year, model, price point, etc.

Also if anyone has any good tips for me for making my first purchase of these types of vintage guitars, it would be much appreciated! Thanks so much.
 

Rich R

In the Zone/Backstage Pass
Joined
Jun 4, 2002
Messages
4,999
Contact Charlie at OK Guitars in CT. He knows a shitload about all that stuff
 

miczap

Active member
Joined
Oct 31, 2018
Messages
213
A century will always beat out a 120 due to the fact that it has a ‘proper’ p90 and not the lesser-loved single coil you’d find in the 120.

i would probably say the century and 125 are equally valued- but as anything, YMMV
 

JimR56

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2012
Messages
588
The only thinline non-cut archtops I ever owned were early 60's Epi Century models. I bought two of them (both cherry red, but with different headstocks and pickguards) at a local flea market in the 1980's, for I think $60 each. I wasn't buying them to keep. In the short time before I flipped them, I noticed that they didn't play very well. I later learned that a lot of those guitars (including their Gibson counterparts) had neck joint issues. That's what I would be concerned most about, if I were you. I used to see a good percentage of them used for slide playing, where (high) action and intonation are less of a problem (relatively speaking, that is).
 

JimR56

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2012
Messages
588
Forgot to address one of your questions. It does indeed seem odd that the Epiphones would be priced higher than the Gibsons. Unless the Epiphones are in better condition, maybe it's just by chance that those sellers went higher with their prices. If you want to post any links, that might help.

Any particular reason that you're looking for a thinline non-cutaway archtop? Not that there's anything wrong with that, of course. Just curious what your inspiration might be. Cheers.
 

rockabilly69

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 29, 2001
Messages
2,875
A century will always beat out a 120 due to the fact that it has a ‘proper’ p90 and not the lesser-loved single coil you’d find in the 120.

i would probably say the century and 125 are equally valued- but as anything, YMMV

I love these style guitars and I've owned a '63 Gibson ES120, '65 Gibson ES125, '62 Epi Century, and a '65 Epi Granada, my two favorites were the '65 ES125 and the '63 ES120 (I should have kept the ES120 because the little single coil in that one sounded GREAT, and I still own the '65 ES125 (the only one I kept). Both of the Epi's came up and short and neither played as well as the Gibsons.


Epi Century...
h5rkwJy.jpg


Epi Granada (with custom Curtis Novak pickup)...
xj10jte.jpg


Gibson ES120
PqNbSM3.jpg


Gibson ES125
9NBTYMQ.jpg
 

deytookerjaabs

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
1,594
The only thinline non-cut archtops I ever owned were early 60's Epi Century models. I bought two of them (both cherry red, but with different headstocks and pickguards) at a local flea market in the 1980's, for I think $60 each. I wasn't buying them to keep. In the short time before I flipped them, I noticed that they didn't play very well. I later learned that a lot of those guitars (including their Gibson counterparts) had neck joint issues. That's what I would be concerned most about, if I were you. I used to see a good percentage of them used for slide playing, where (high) action and intonation are less of a problem (relatively speaking, that is).


Ditto on the neck issues.


My last ES-125 was a '58. I sold it for cheap on craigslist disclosing a neck issue, the pocket was a hair loose thus it absolutely needed a reset. You could only tell if you put heavy gauge strings on or just pulled at it a bit.


Shortly after I sold it the guitar was for sale at Carter's for $2,000 with no disclosure of the neck issue and the same super-lite strings on it. :laugh2:


If I was in the market for a box right now I'd skip a 125 and get a full size archtop.
 

rockabilly69

Well-known member
Joined
Jul 29, 2001
Messages
2,875
Ditto on the neck issues.


My last ES-125 was a '58. I sold it for cheap on craigslist disclosing a neck issue, the pocket was a hair loose thus it absolutely needed a reset. You could only tell if you put heavy gauge strings on or just pulled at it a bit.


Shortly after I sold it the guitar was for sale at Carter's for $2,000 with no disclosure of the neck issue and the same super-lite strings on it. :laugh2:


If I was in the market for a box right now I'd skip a 125 and get a full size archtop.

Neither my ES125 or ES120 had neck issues and the ES125 still plays perfectly today, but the Granada and Century never felt right to me!
 

jonnyglock9

New member
Joined
Apr 10, 2020
Messages
4
Apologies for the long overdue response. I appreciate all of your valuable insights and great info!

I suppose my main motivation for seeking out these makes/models of guitars is to grab my own little slice of American vintage guitar history, at a price I can afford. Admittedly, when I write it out like that, it seems like a silly justification.

Overall, I like having a handful of different guitars with different feels, sounds, tonalities, etc. So that in itself is a valid reason to include one of these in my collection. But I am still weighing my options... :)
 

JimR56

Member
Joined
Oct 20, 2012
Messages
588
I suppose my main motivation for seeking out these makes/models of guitars is to grab my own little slice of American vintage guitar history, at a price I can afford. Admittedly, when I write it out like that, it seems like a silly justification.

Not silly at all. I totally get it.

Overall, I like having a handful of different guitars with different feels, sounds, tonalities, etc. So that in itself is a valid reason to include one of these in my collection. But I am still weighing my options... :)

Makes perfect sense also, in fact that's how I (and I'm sure a lot of others) built my collection.

Hope you find one that plays well and meets your expectations. :salude
 

S a m

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2011
Messages
182
... on the neck issues ... If I was in the market for a box right now I'd skip a 125 and get a full size archtop.

There's a big distinction between the full-depth ES-125 and the ES-120/ES-125T. The big guy is as sturdy as a Gibson archtop ever was. The 120/125T neck joint is notoriously sketchy.

I suppose my main motivation for seeking out these makes/models of guitars is to grab my own little slice of American vintage guitar history, at a price I can afford. Admittedly, when I write it out like that, it seems like a silly justification.

Overall, I like having a handful of different guitars with different feels, sounds, tonalities, etc. So that in itself is a valid reason to include one of these in my collection. But I am still weighing my options... :)
As Jaabs notes, you'll find a welcoming crowd here with that approach.

But if that's where you're at and if archtops are not familiar territory for you, consider waiting until after The Pandemic and shopping in-hand. As they say, "You don't know what you don't know."

Chercher le ton!
 
Last edited:

oceantoad

Well-known member
Joined
May 25, 2003
Messages
1,165
Thank you, all. Lots of good and useful info! :2zone
Don't forget about Guild! '61 Starfire III w Dearmonds (Cherry) and (Blonde) 1960 T100BDP ...great tone and even greater price point on these! Shameless plug .

Win a shootout with ES125 any day !
 
Last edited:

deytookerjaabs

Well-known member
Joined
Nov 6, 2016
Messages
1,594
There's a big distinction between the full-depth ES-125 and the ES-120/ES-125T. The big guy is as sturdy as a Gibson archtop ever was. The 120/125T neck joint is notoriously sketchy.


As Jaabs notes, you'll find a welcoming crowd here with that approach.

But if that's where you're at and if archtops are not familiar territory for you, consider waiting until after The Pandemic and shopping in-hand. As they say, "You don't know what you don't know."

Chercher le ton!



My bad, my ES-125's have all been the "t" models, not the full depth boxes.


But, as to my point on archtops I just think you can score some real nice stuff in the vintage world out there if you wait.
 
Top