Swjake83
New member
- Joined
- Mar 26, 2019
- Messages
- 8
So I’m in the market for a Les Paul. I have a SG standard with the thin neck that I’m selling to help fund this guitar. I’d like to stay around $1,500 but would go a little more for the right guitar. I don’t want a fat neck, but I don’t want the thin either. So here is the question;
should I be looking at the ‘16 traditionals (I’ve read this was a great year for this model and I can find a few), or the early 2000’s standards? Specifically a 2003. How similar or how different are these guitars? Are the newer traditionals closer to that era standard than they are different?
i will probably swap parts to make it my version of a r9 but for now assuming stock appointments.
thanks in advance. The neck is what is the most obvious area of question, but I’m interested in any and all applicable differences and I know this is the place to find the answers!
should I be looking at the ‘16 traditionals (I’ve read this was a great year for this model and I can find a few), or the early 2000’s standards? Specifically a 2003. How similar or how different are these guitars? Are the newer traditionals closer to that era standard than they are different?
i will probably swap parts to make it my version of a r9 but for now assuming stock appointments.
thanks in advance. The neck is what is the most obvious area of question, but I’m interested in any and all applicable differences and I know this is the place to find the answers!