• Guys, we've spent considerable money converting the Les Paul Forum to this new XenForo platform, and we have ongoing monthly operating expenses. THE "DONATIONS" TAB IS NOW WORKING, AND WE WOULD APPRECIATE ANY DONATIONS YOU CAN MAKE TO KEEP THE LES PAUL FORUM GOING! Thank you!

Historics, differences vs Regular US Gibson, production line?

Texas Blues

Active member
Joined
Apr 13, 2008
Messages
4,641
I know-most of us are such meanies. No help whatsoever.


Mr. Easton.

You are a very well known meanie.

On this forum.

So mean in fact.

I would wash your dishes.

Do your laundry.

And cook for you.

Just to say hello and shake your hand.

And then....

Like some people on this forum.


I'd tell you how I would have played it better.

:hee
 

Elliot Easton

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 5, 2003
Messages
3,478
Mr. Easton.

You are a very well known meanie.

On this forum.

So mean in fact.

I would wash your dishes.

Do your laundry.

And cook for you.

Just to say hello and shake your hand.

And then....

Like some people on this forum.


I'd tell you how I would have played it better.

:hee

Hahahaha! Ya still got it- what a card!!!
 

jb_abides

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
5,397
Learned something new @ 23:20 in Peaches Custom Shop vid => CS Firebird wedge joined by hide glue. :salude
 

El Gringo

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 8, 2015
Messages
5,666
Got a little bit curios. When they build the Historics are they totally separated from the Regular Usa Gibson production line? Or is the same people building these too? Do they build it in another way or is it the same, except some differences in construction?
2 very separate divisions which operate from different buildings and locations in Nashville .
 

Bruce R

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
1,034
As I recall the late 90's-early 2000's Les Paul Classics were very decent guitars, and not that different than the new Historics being produced at that time. The Classics/Standards today are light-years removed from the Historics, but was this always the case?
 

jb_abides

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 6, 2005
Messages
5,397
As I recall the late 90's-early 2000's Les Paul Classics were very decent guitars, and not that different than the new Historics being produced at that time. The Classics/Standards today are light-years removed from the Historics, but was this always the case?

Well, I don't know about light years...

I have a 2000 and 2018 USA Classic -- as well as many Custom Shop Reissues.

While the Reissues are in a league above, the Classics are both stellar guitars. Apart from the obvious spec difference (2000 has the ceramics & Klusons, snotty inlays; 2018 has P90s & Grovers), both are of similar construction and quality.

I'd say the big difference is wood, at least in my 2. The 2000 closer in weight to a Reissue, still not from the same "wood sort" as Historics though...

2018 is heftier. You know they really could have done the weight relief, but didn't :)

:salude
 

Big Al

Well-known member
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
14,543
As I recall the late 90's-early 2000's Les Paul Classics were very decent guitars, and not that different than the new Historics being produced at that time. The Classics/Standards today are light-years removed from the Historics, but was this always the case?

No, your recollection is completely wrong in every way.
 

Bruce R

Well-known member
Joined
Mar 2, 2007
Messages
1,034
No, your recollection is completely wrong in every way.

I hear you, Al! I really didn't play much attention to the "newer" Gibsons in those days, as I've always had my '69 Custom as my main guitar and my '56 Strat. I really didn't understand the Historics/Custom Shop instruments until about 2007 when I was researching the purchase of my '06 R8. You're right - no comparison!
 
Top