Highway Star
New member
- Joined
- Oct 8, 2017
- Messages
- 192
From a vintage collecting viewpoint. What do you think about refretting a 50's les paul with stainless steel frets? Are original size nickel frets a must or is it arbitrary?
Thanks for your input. To me steel frets are better when it comes to playing and they last forever.
But I haven't a clue how steel frets affects the "vintage factor". A puritan or collector might think it will destroy the guitar?
Not a guru by any means, but think of it this way: you have two guitars, same year, same condition, both play well and sound good, one has original frets in at least playable shape, one has been refretted. The one that's been refretted will be worth less than the one with original frets, all things being equal. Doesn't matter if the replacement frets are stainless steel or squished-together tin cans, although you might be able to lessen the impact if you can credibly demonstrate they're NOS Gibson frets from the correct year - but that's a tough thing to prove, and, as the saying goes, the simpler the story, the easier the sell.
At the low end of the price spectrum, the difference isn't so much. At the high end, it starts being significant - in absolute dollars or pounds, although not necessarily in terms of percentage of the value of the instrument.
As I said, not a guru, just my understanding of the situation.