Les Paul Forum
The Fender Forum
NEW! LPF Facebook Page
LilyPix
Merchandise & Donations
Vintage Guitar Registry
LPF Homesite

Go Back   Les Paul Forum > . > Historic District
Register FAQ Mark Forums Read Calendar Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-01-13, 01:10 PM   #1
59Vampire
Les Paul Forum Member
 
59Vampire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,191
1998 historics more accurate than 2013

In terms of inaccuracies


Hah. Got ya. Of course they aren't. The inlays are wrong, they are double stained to enhance flame the bridge pup is slightly off, a gap in the pick guard. But, since its my only one and can not afford another I have to put my spin on it. That's why it is far superior to a vintage burst

In fact, mine is so inaccurate the body is stamped r8 and the serial is r9. But it plays, sounds, and looks cool. At least it has a one piece board

Love the one your with.
__________________
You make me want to pick up a guitar and celebrate the myriad ways that I love you.

Last edited by 59Vampire : 09-01-13 at 01:30 PM.
59Vampire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 01:16 PM   #2
StonedMoses
Les Paul Forum Member
 
StonedMoses's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 56
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

you're right in most points...

BUT I would never sell mine because I love it...
__________________
Gibson Les Paul R8 1998 Flametop
Gibson SST Chet Atkins Celebrity Edition
StonedMoses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 01:30 PM   #3
DonP
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,009
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

huh?

You lost me. So you are saying you want to stick with your 1998 instead of upgrading to a superior 2013? LOL! More power to you. I'm happy with my 6 LP's.
DonP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 01:43 PM   #4
StonedMoses
Les Paul Forum Member
 
StonedMoses's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Germany
Posts: 56
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

I don't know where you see the update on 2013... Sure they are historically more correct but why should I sell a guitar that looks and sounds great and that I'm happy with?

Your 6 LPS are from 2013???
__________________
Gibson Les Paul R8 1998 Flametop
Gibson SST Chet Atkins Celebrity Edition
StonedMoses is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 01:46 PM   #5
MikeG59
Les Paul Forum Member
 
MikeG59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,872
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

Superior? In what respect? Vintage accuracy? what the hell does that have to do with superior workmanship and quality of tone and playability? The 90's models are unique in their own way. Better than current in some respects, not all.
MikeG59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 02:05 PM   #6
59Vampire
Les Paul Forum Member
 
59Vampire's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,191
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeG59 View Post
Superior? In what respect? Vintage accuracy? what the hell does that have to do with superior workmanship and quality of tone and playability? The 90's models are unique in their own way. Better than current in some respects, not all.
Lol. I think Don is just tongue n cheekin it the way my post was meant to be. It's all good.
__________________
You make me want to pick up a guitar and celebrate the myriad ways that I love you.
59Vampire is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 02:10 PM   #7
Black58
All Access/Backstage Pass
 
Black58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In the bathroom, fixing my guitar.
Posts: 9,586
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

I'll NEVER get rid of my '97! .. A great guitar is a great guitar.
__________________
People with lots of words are usually lying or stupid.




http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ChObi...ature=youtu.be
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ExkXbm_pA5U
*"Turn To Stone" - 8-11-12* .. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ROyHg...ature=youtu.be
Black58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 04:40 PM   #8
Pip
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 1,011
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

2014
Pip is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 06:40 PM   #9
MikeG59
Les Paul Forum Member
 
MikeG59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,872
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

listen. we all have our own views and Gibson has us wrapped. They change a few things every year or so to keep us buying more guitars. That doesn't mean its a bad thing. But think about their long term planning once they realized how many guitars they could sell and what they could get away with charging for them. touché
MikeG59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 06:41 PM   #10
MikeG59
Les Paul Forum Member
 
MikeG59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Long Island
Posts: 1,872
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by 59Vampire View Post
Lol. I think Don is just tongue n cheekin it the way my post was meant to be. It's all good.
I see what you mean after re-reading. But the point is valid I think
MikeG59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 06:56 PM   #11
Pat Boyack
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Pat Boyack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 3,271
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Black58 View Post
I'll NEVER get rid of my '97! .. A great guitar is a great guitar.
Ditto. My '97 R6 kicks ass.
Pat Boyack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-13, 09:41 PM   #12
DonP
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 3,009
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

Yes, that was what the LOL! was for.

My point is if you have something that works, stick with it.

And no, no 2013's for me.

I have the 1956, 1977, 1996, 2002, 2004, and 2009 inacurate models LOL!
DonP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-13, 05:10 AM   #13
oldflame
Les Paul Forum Member
 
oldflame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 950
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

I've had a couple of 98's. I kinda liked them. Nice flashy tops n'all but they were too heavy for me.
__________________
Missing the real ale.
oldflame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-13, 06:01 AM   #14
guitarchitecture
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 836
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeG59 View Post
Superior? In what respect? Vintage accuracy? what the hell does that have to do with superior workmanship and quality of tone and playability? The 90's models are unique in their own way. Better than current in some respects, not all.
luv my '92 PRE Historic- great guitar
guitarchitecture is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-13, 09:30 AM   #15
raph
Les Paul Forum Member
 
raph's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 130
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

There are exceptions, but on average IMHO the wood in the 90s (especially the ebony) is better than in later years. I don't have a historic/reissue from the 90s, but my Gibson USA Les Paul Special TV Yellow from '96 is a much better guitar with much nicer wood and paint than the similar model released from the custom shop today. The secondhand price reflects this too.
raph is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-13, 12:29 PM   #16
herb
Les Paul Forum Member
 
herb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 611
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

My '95 R8 is the best sounding modern Les Paul that I have ever played. I check out the newer ones when I see them in the shops. Nothing has come close.
herb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-03-13, 02:40 PM   #17
sidekick
Les Paul Forum Member
 
sidekick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Mainly, within my home
Posts: 2,833
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by herb View Post
My '95 R8 is the best sounding modern Les Paul that I have ever played. I check out the newer ones when I see them in the shops. Nothing has come close.
Glad you have found your "the one".

Sometimes, can take years. Especially, when all the aspects of sound and playability come together for the individual. Even with the old original LP's, some are considered better than others.

Chances are, that some are also looking for a great top which appeals as well and that can further compound things even further...
__________________

sidekick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-04-13, 12:34 PM   #18
herb
Les Paul Forum Member
 
herb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 611
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by sidekick View Post
Glad you have found your "the one".

Sometimes, can take years. Especially, when all the aspects of sound and playability come together for the individual. Even with the old original LP's, some are considered better than others.

Chances are, that some are also looking for a great top which appeals as well and that can further compound things even further...
Thanks, yeah, I was lucky. The guitar is completely stock, too. Sometimes I think about putting a light-weight tailpiece on it but why mess with a good thing.

Although I am not a nit-picker about historic accuracies I do love the looks of the flame tops but have grown to appreciate my guitar for what it is, a great sounding and playing instrument.

Also, most of the Les Paul players that I dig from 60's and 70's had one LP they were known for. If that was good enough for them...
herb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-13, 03:09 PM   #19
Todd Louis
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Todd Louis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: NYC
Posts: 14,331
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

One thing you got there is the better finnish......
__________________
The World Needs a MARSHALL ENEMA !


Brooklyn,Manhattan,Queens,Da Bronx, Staten Island.....
NYC The Greatest Country in DA World....!

"Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives.
I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that.
That's what's insane about it."
John Lennon
Todd Louis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-07-13, 07:47 PM   #20
Biggles58
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Biggles58's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Posts: 933
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

I remember my first post on this forum; proudly posting a pic of '98 R8 and intoducing myself to the community, What followed was a long list of comments regarding the '98 resissues "innacuracies". It was a humbling if not an educational experience. 13 years later I still have the guitar. I've made some minor mods; Montreaux ring, poker chip switch ring and pickguard, a vintage Bigsby and RS vintage style pots and caps. Is it still "innaccurate"? Well, I suppose so but I still love the guitar and play it often. So the moral is it may not be an exact replica of a vintage Sunburst but it is still a great guitar...
Biggles58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-09-13, 04:26 PM   #21
herb
Les Paul Forum Member
 
herb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Washington State
Posts: 611
Re: 1998 historics more accurate than 2013

Quote:
Originally Posted by Todd Louis View Post
One thing you got there is the better finnish......
Way better finish than what is offered now. Plus, my guess would be that Gibson had a better supply of tone woods back then.
herb is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:34 AM.



Scroll Down And Click On All Of Our Sponsors' Logos For Their Websites!
















The Les Paul Forum is a privately owned and operated site.
The Les Paul Forum is in no way affiliated with Gibson Musical Instrument Corporation.
All trademarks are the property of GMIC.

All messages on this forum express the views of the author
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
The Les Paul Forum and/or it's administration.
The Les Paul Forum will not be held responsible for the content
of any messages posted on this forum.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 Les Paul Forum