Les Paul Forum
The Fender Forum
The Cafe Wah
LilyPix
Merchandise
Vintage Guitar Registry
LPF Homesite

Go Back   Les Paul Forum > . > The Other Gibsons
Register FAQ Mark Forums Read Calendar Calendar Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-19-10, 12:27 AM   #1
Bluuzman
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Bluuzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,604
Esseries Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Could anybody describe the sound difference ES-335 vs ES 350, both with P-90 pickups?
__________________
Blues ain't bad

Bluuzman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 04:29 AM   #2
keef
Les Paul Forum Member
 
keef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5,000
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Apples and bananas.

Why the question?
keef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 04:40 AM   #3
Axel
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Axel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UmeŚ, Sweden
Posts: 3,480
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

I didn't know there were any ES-335's with P-90's made.
__________________
I play a Trini Lopez Reissue through a Fender Blues Jr. Sunburst.

Quote:
Originally Posted by camohoyt View Post
I'm sure only Axel knows if they have wax potting. He knows stuff that Gibson don't even know about there own guitars. Like an angel from Les Paul Heaven!
Axel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 04:42 AM   #4
keef
Les Paul Forum Member
 
keef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5,000
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Axel View Post
I didn't know there were any ES-335's with P-90's made.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D_355QnDbyw

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Sx4a9r2xEa4
keef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 04:44 AM   #5
Axel
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Axel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: UmeŚ, Sweden
Posts: 3,480
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Quote:
Originally Posted by keef View Post
Sweet!
__________________
I play a Trini Lopez Reissue through a Fender Blues Jr. Sunburst.

Quote:
Originally Posted by camohoyt View Post
I'm sure only Axel knows if they have wax potting. He knows stuff that Gibson don't even know about there own guitars. Like an angel from Les Paul Heaven!
Axel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 06:07 AM   #6
GotTheSilver
All Access/Backstage Pass
 
GotTheSilver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 1,367
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Quote:
Originally Posted by keef View Post
Why the question?
I believe the OP had another thread recently where he said he had been bit by the hollowbody/semi-hollow bug and wanted to get educated on 335s.

Bluuzman - I am familiar with 335s, but have no first hand experience with the ES-350. Still, based solely on the specs, I would expect these to be very different sounding guitars, with different advantages/disadvantages in different situations. Structurally, they are very different guitars, especially if you are talking about the full depth 350 and not the thinline version 350T. Which one is a better choice for you depends on what you want to use it for. I'm sure people more familiar with the 350 will chime in and be more helpful than I can be on the sonic differences.

When you think about musicians whose sound you really like, what do they play?
GotTheSilver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 08:22 AM   #7
bizzwriter
Les Paul Forum Member
 
bizzwriter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Left coast
Posts: 783
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

I used to have a '56 ES-350TN (just like Danny Gatton's with the spruce top). While it looked really cool (REALLY cool), it wasn't very good for playing leads. Not as much neck to work with as an ES-335 and the bridge kept moving around when I really tugged on the strings (floating wood bridge). Plus as I recall it had a shorter scale than the Gibson standard 24.75. I think it would be okay if you're mostly playing chords, but if you do a lot of leads, I would recommend the 335.
__________________
Music is the BEST!
bizzwriter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 08:51 AM   #8
apossibleworld
Les Paul Forum Member
 
apossibleworld's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Squibnocket
Posts: 351
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

I'm a big fan of 350Ts but they're a weird creature indeed. But hey, it's the first Chuck Berry guitar! The only way to make them play well is to use very heavy strings, which won't end up feeling so heavy with the short scale. That's probably why your bridge was moving around. You've got to use 12s or 13s or higher.

But to compare with a 335, well that's just apples and giraffes. Did the OP mean to write ES-330? Because that's a more sense-making comparison.
apossibleworld is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 09:18 AM   #9
Bluuzman
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Bluuzman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Germany
Posts: 1,604
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Quote:
Originally Posted by keef View Post
Apples and bananas.

Why the question?
I have seen that some guitarists used an ES-335 to get the T-Bone Walker sound. Others used an ES-350 to get this sound. Especially, the ES-350 version with the push/pull potentiometer for the Bridge pickup shall deliver the T-Bone Walker sound.
__________________
Blues ain't bad

Bluuzman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 09:52 AM   #10
bigsby'd
All Access/Backstage Pass
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,886
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

push-pull on a 350 pot? Huh?
bigsby'd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 10:27 AM   #11
bizzwriter
Les Paul Forum Member
 
bizzwriter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Left coast
Posts: 783
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Sorry. Can't let this thread go any farther without a photo of my departed '56 ES-350TN. Last time I saw her, she was in a box headed to Belgium.

__________________
Music is the BEST!
bizzwriter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 12:11 PM   #12
MikeSlub
Admin/Burst Advisory
In the Zone
 
MikeSlub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: America the Beautiful
Posts: 12,095
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Even the thinner ES-350 is going to sound very different from an ES-335 due to the completely hollow body of the 350 versus the center block 335.
__________________
Mike Slubowski

* "Gibson guitars are like potato chips - you can't have just one!"

* "So many Gibsons to love, so little time..."
MikeSlub is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 12:31 PM   #13
j45
Les Paul Forum Member
 
j45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,215
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

I've had several 350's. One was pretty good. I much prefer the sound of a 330 with a more "Gibson-like" spacing of the pickups and the tone of the more traditional placement on the harmonic scale. 350T's never sound as rich and sweet (to my ear) as 330's. If I was going to pick from a pair of hollow vs. semi-hollow thinlines it would definitely be a 330 rather than 350. I do like 350T's but the bigger body with small, skinny neck is awkward to me and a 330 feels just right.
j45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 12:35 PM   #14
j45
Les Paul Forum Member
 
j45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 8,215
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

The best thing about 350T's is the looks IMO. One of the most beautuiful guitars ever. This one was the prettiest I had but my '59 330 laid it completely to waste in every way imaginable:





j45 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 01:18 PM   #15
keef
Les Paul Forum Member
 
keef's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Netherlands
Posts: 5,000
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluuzman View Post
I have seen that some guitarists used an ES-335 to get the T-Bone Walker sound. Others used an ES-350 to get this sound. Especially, the ES-350 version with the push/pull potentiometer for the Bridge pickup shall deliver the T-Bone Walker sound.
T Bone used various Gibsons. On his most famous T Bone Blues album - essential listening - he is pictured with a ES-5.

keef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 02:47 PM   #16
TW59
Les Paul Forum Member
 
TW59's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Lost in the Ozarks [again]
Posts: 34,029
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Quote:
Originally Posted by bizzwriter View Post
Sorry. Can't let this thread go any farther without a photo of my departed '56 ES-350TN. Last time I saw her, she was in a box headed to Belgium.

With a spruce top!
__________________
Pauls to the walls!

HŁter der Flammen!

PLEASE SUPPORT www.burstserial.com !!
Click here: www.burstserial.com
TW59 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-19-10, 04:55 PM   #17
Elliot Easton
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Elliot Easton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,239
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bluuzman View Post
I have seen that some guitarists used an ES-335 to get the T-Bone Walker sound. Others used an ES-350 to get this sound. Especially, the ES-350 version with the push/pull potentiometer for the Bridge pickup shall deliver the T-Bone Walker sound.
later on, t-bone used a kessell to get t-bone sound. which proves how important the guitar is,
__________________
"A little bit of knowledge can be a very dangerous thing."
Elliot Easton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-10, 12:41 AM   #18
bluesjuke
Les Paul Forum Member
 
bluesjuke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Bluesland,Texas
Posts: 6,822
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

It take "very dry" fingers to get the T Bone thing going on.
__________________
"Brings me the most special feeling I most ever had"
bluesjuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-10, 01:49 PM   #19
hipbluescat
Les Paul Forum Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 326
Re: Sound difference ES-335 vs ES-350?

Whet do you mean by very dry fingers to get the T Bone thing going?
hipbluescat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:44 PM.



 



The Les Paul Forum is a privately owned and operated site.
The Les Paul Forum is in no way affiliated with Gibson Musical Instrument Corporation.
All trademarks are the property of GMIC.

All messages on this forum express the views of the author
and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of
The Les Paul Forum and/or it's administration.
The Les Paul Forum will not be held responsible for the content
of any messages posted on this forum.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2014 Les Paul Forum