![]() |
|
|
#1 |
|
Les Paul Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: STL
Posts: 1,207
|
Holly headstock
Yo!
Dumb question... what the hell are you guys talking about when you bring up "Holly" headstock veneer? It's the "holly" that's throwing me off...
__________________
~Gregory Last edited by Tonesnob : 08-21-01 at 01:01 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Les Paul Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,283
|
Under the black lacquer, if you look at the side of the headstock, you'll see a thin strip of wood that's a different color than the mahogany. It varies in thickness, but it's usually a 32nd or 3/64ths thick. This veneer is put on the headstock face so the black lacquer is easier to finish- mahogany would require a lot of pore filling and such. It also helps locate the inlay.
On modern production models since the early '70s, the headstock veneer is actually a piece of thin cardboard reinforced with plastic. On the original models and the reissue, it's holly. I HAVE, however, seen early reissues that were certainly maple under the black. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Les Paul Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: STL
Posts: 1,207
|
Interesting... thanks Ed
What do you mean by "...helps locate the inlay"? When does the "Gibson" & L. Paul logo get applied/silkscreened? I think all of this stuff is really interesting! This forums' cool.
__________________
~Gregory |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Les Paul Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,283
|
They cut a hole that the inlay fits into in teh holly headstock veneer- it's ot a perfect outline, but the logo fits perfectly edge-wise, and the lean of the angle is set by this outline. The extra space if filled by epoxy, then painted over. Once the paint is dry, they shoot a couplew coats fo clear on it, and after that's been buffed, they silkscreen or dry-transfer the signature. No clear coat over the gold, as it would darken and be harder to see.
That's what the forum is for, after all- to share this sort of info. |
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Admin/Burst Advisory
In the Zone Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: America the Beautiful
Posts: 11,169
|
Like Ed said, we saw them doing the silkscreens of "Les Paul Model" on the Historics at the Custom Shop in the final assembly area.
__________________
![]() * "Gibson guitars are like potato chips - you can't have just one!" * "So many Gibsons to love, so little time..." |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Les Paul Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Londinium, UK
Posts: 3,607
|
These vary quite a bit in thickness. On the 50's guitars it's paper thin, a real veneer only there to give an easily finished surface and only visible where there's finish damge. On the Historics it can be much thicker, on one historic Goldtop I saw recently it was MUCH thicker and scraped to give a light accent line. It looked kinda cool but nothing like the old ones. I'd love to know what made them choose Holly, it's the weirdest wood to use for this job being pale and needing to be painted.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Les Paul Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Land of Wood and Water Shortage
Posts: 500
|
Would ebony have worked?
__________________
With patience and determination, one day, my playing will not suck. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Les Paul Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,283
|
Holly worked because:
A) it was available B) It was Cheap C) It took a finish really well I've seen originals with somewhat thick veneers, but none so thick as the ones they're putting on the Historics. Ebony would have been prohibitively expensive, because the wood is expensive, the wood is VERY hard on tools, and it's hard to tool- it's brittle and if you shave it too thin it'll crack if you look at it wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Les Paul Forum Member
Classic Club Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Over The Hills And Far Awry
Posts: 800
|
Maybe Holly was used for its stability as a veneer on mahogany (i.e. same expansion characteristics?)
My LP is completely "Un-Holly," they just painted it. I don't think it would make any difference to the sound, in the way alder-laminated poplar Strat bodies are affected.
__________________
Like the avatar? My guitar, at night. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Les Paul Forum Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 6,283
|
Which Les paul do you have, Des? I don't remember a Les Paul Standard or above that didn't have some sort of veneer. Even the Studios had it, I think.
Holly moves like crazy- it's hard to stabilize and takes a long time to dry- it's a member of the yew family, i think, so it's really springy and weak. Mahogany doesn't move a lot compared to holly. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Fiendish One
Forum Moderator Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 32deg. 56'20.73N 117deg. 51.27w
Posts: 7,900
|
Holly sounds alot better than "Butternut" does. Who knows what they used or really use, but the truth of the matter it was economics. The Butternut or Holly they used was probably the cheapest, easiest to slice, and apply.
Maple is more brittle, so it doesn't keep or work as well, and there is more potential for waste. They wanted a smooth looking black lacquer surface where the grain won't sink in like it does mahogany. Imagine silkscreening the Les Paul logo over sunken grain. :dead:
__________________ "Rock and F'in Roll" -Slash- "You know what's wrong with music these days? Nobody chokes to death on their own vomit anymore!" |