The Fender Forum
NEW! LPF Facebook Page
LilyPix
Merchandise & Donations
NEW! Burst Serial Log Home Page
LPF Homesite
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 40 of 67
  1. #1
    Les Paul Forum Member bluesforstevie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Nellytown U. City MO
    Posts
    12,668

    The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Ok...I don't even know what to call it anymore? It's no longer called an historic, no longer called custom shop...so, what is it officially called?

    What is the nut material?

    Has the plastic changed? The color?

    Hot Hide Glue on just the neck tenon and mortise?

    What is a Custom Bucker?

    What is the fingerboard wood? Why did they go to a two piece board last year? How did they find a supply of wood this year? (don't answer if it's going to be a drawn out argument)

    There is no longer a truss rod condom?

    Neck shape...any difference this year?

    Body carve....better this year?

    Anything else? I know the color of the neck binding is different...anything else?
    "bereft of consciousness and self-awareness, yet ambulant and able to respond to surrounding stimuli."

  2. #2
    Formerly Lefty Elmo Steve Craw's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Upstate NY
    Posts
    4,381

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    I'm going to The House of Guitars on Saturday to check them out!
    "The Dude abides"

    With me, you never know...Hell, I don't even know what I might do next.

  3. #3
    All Access/Backstage Pass poon99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rochester,NY
    Posts
    914

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Craw View Post
    I'm going to The House of Guitars on Saturday to check them out!
    I just goy back from there and they just got two more R9s and I left with one of them....


  4. #4
    All Access/Backstage Pass poon99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rochester,NY
    Posts
    914

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Ok...I don't even know what to call it anymore? It's no longer called an historic, no longer called custom shop...so, what is it officially called?

    What is the nut material? Nylon

    Has the plastic changed? The color? Yes it is whiter with a yellowish cast for the binding and whiter on the rest.

    Hot Hide Glue on just the neck tenon and mortise? Yes.HOT HIDE GLUE

    What is a Custom Bucker? Its a custom wound PAF with A3 magnets.

    What is the fingerboard wood? Why did they go to a two piece board last year? How did they find a supply of wood this year? (don't answer if it's going to be a drawn out argument) one piece Rosewood. and so far all have been very dark.

    There is no longer a truss rod condom? Condom is gone

    Neck shape...any difference this year? Yes, less shoulder.

    Body carve....better this year? Yes.

    Anything else? I know the color of the neck binding is different...anything else? aniline dye on sides and back,Single line Kluson Tuners, 4 degree neck angle,darker knobs,headstock shape like vintage.
    Last edited by poon99; 01-25-13 at 02:52 PM.

  5. #5

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Is is "hot hide glue", or just hide glue?
    "Perhaps you have a vibrato that sounds like a goat
    trying to mount Diane Rehm as she conjures the
    ghost of Katherine Hepburn with a ouija board?"
    -David Von Bader

  6. #6
    All Access/Backstage Pass poon99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rochester,NY
    Posts
    914

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by Cogswell View Post
    Is is "hot hide glue", or just hide glue?
    HOT hide glue.

  7. #7
    Les Paul Forum Member bluesforstevie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Nellytown U. City MO
    Posts
    12,668

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by poon99 View Post
    Ok...I don't even know what to call it anymore? It's no longer called an historic, no longer called custom shop...so, what is it officially called?

    What is the nut material? Nylon

    Has the plastic changed? The color? Yes it is whiter with a yellowish cast for the binding and whiter on the rest.

    Hot Hide Glue on just the neck tenon and mortise? Yes.

    What is a Custom Bucker? Its a custom wound PAF with A3 magnets.

    What is the fingerboard wood? Why did they go to a two piece board last year? How did they find a supply of wood this year? (don't answer if it's going to be a drawn out argument) one piece Rosewood. and so far all have been very dark.

    There is no longer a truss rod condom? Condom is gone

    Neck shape...any difference this year? Yes, less shoulder.

    Body carve....better this year? Yes.

    Anything else? I know the color of the neck binding is different...anything else? aniline dye on sides and back,Single line Klusion Tuners, 4 degree neck angle,darker knobs,headstock shape like vintage.
    Thank you...

    Boy, I tell you..in the pics I've seen...the nut is so opaque and white...I thought maybe they went back to...what was it? ....corian?

    I think they're dying the boards because in their description they even say the fingerboard color is more like the old ones or something like that...how did they find the rosewood? I thought that's why they had to use a two piece system last year...because there wasn't enough madagascar and the Indian was now on the forbidden list....or whatever.
    "bereft of consciousness and self-awareness, yet ambulant and able to respond to surrounding stimuli."

  8. #8
    Les Paul Forum Member fakejake's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    lost in the changes
    Posts
    520

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Shit this sounds great! All this talk about the 2013 specs left me with M A J O R GAS for a R4. I'm dying to see the Goldtop top and back colors. Now if they'd only use long steel studs for the tailpieces....

  9. #9
    Les Paul Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2002
    Posts
    1,107

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by poon99 View Post
    I just goy back from there and they just got two more R9s and I left with one of them....

    Killer les paul! congrats!
    What are the new custom burstbuckers like? curious to what they have done?

  10. #10

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by poon99 View Post
    HOT hide glue.
    I haven't seen any links to Gibson's website confirming this.
    "Perhaps you have a vibrato that sounds like a goat
    trying to mount Diane Rehm as she conjures the
    ghost of Katherine Hepburn with a ouija board?"
    -David Von Bader

  11. #11
    Les Paul Forum Member D'Mule's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Minneapolis, Minnesota
    Posts
    4,572

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    We need Danelectro to make some serious changes to the Year by Year History of the Historic timeline sticky.

    Cogs, can you edit that?
    '94 Gibson LP CS Standard
    '02 Gibson LP '58 CA
    '03 Gibson Firebird CS Non-Reverse
    '05 Gibson LP '54
    '06 Gibson LP '58 VOS
    '12 Squier Bullet Strat
    '14 Squier '51
    '14 Epiphone Genesis Pro
    '92 Washburn D17SCE
    '70s Val Dez Classical
    5F1A Tweed
    V Series V1512
    #698 THD Univalve
    Crate V5 (OpAmp Mod)
    Crate V33 (SLO Mod)

    Quote Originally Posted by j45 View Post
    But the forum is...still a great place to hang out if you want to chat about guitars or blindside and humiliate unsuspecting chumps with our endless supply of vitriol.

  12. #12
    Les Paul Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    3,395

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by poon99 View Post
    Ok...I don't even know what to call it anymore? It's no longer called an historic, no longer called custom shop...so, what is it officially called?

    What is the nut material? Nylon

    Has the plastic changed? The color? Yes it is whiter with a yellowish cast for the binding and whiter on the rest.

    Hot Hide Glue on just the neck tenon and mortise? Yes.HOT HIDE GLUE

    What is a Custom Bucker? Its a custom wound PAF with A3 magnets.

    What is the fingerboard wood? Why did they go to a two piece board last year? How did they find a supply of wood this year? (don't answer if it's going to be a drawn out argument) one piece Rosewood. and so far all have been very dark.

    There is no longer a truss rod condom? Condom is gone

    Neck shape...any difference this year? Yes, less shoulder.

    Body carve....better this year? Yes.

    Anything else? I know the color of the neck binding is different...anything else? aniline dye on sides and back,Single line Kluson Tuners, 4 degree neck angle,darker knobs,headstock shape like vintage.
    What is with Gibson using A3 mags in so many of the sig LP's (Page, Clapton, etc.) and now the reissues?. I don't think A3 was used much or at all on the originals. Is it that A3 more closely gets the sound of an aged vintage PAF pickup with (originally A5 or whatever) mags in the PU's?.

    Al

  13. #13
    Les Paul Forum Member DanD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Posts
    1,725

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by zombiwoof View Post
    What is with Gibson using A3 mags in so many of the sig LP's (Page, Clapton, etc.) and now the reissues?. I don't think A3 was used much or at all on the originals. Is it that A3 more closely gets the sound of an aged vintage PAF pickup with (originally A5 or whatever) mags in the PU's?.

    Al
    IDKW Gibson is using A3 mags but the gits I've tried with them seem to be a tad warmer and rounder sounding than A2 mags.

    Never been a fan of A5 mags as they sound harsher and more abrupt.

    While the highs are sweeter with A3 mags the lows seem a bit mushy and lacking focus.

    An A3-A2-A5 (EB-GD-AE) mag combination for pole piece mag pups could be a winner.
    "In Heaven all the interesting people are missing."

  14. #14
    Les Paul Forum Member Todd Louis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,305

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    They have always been called Historic's and they still are.
    The World Needs a MARSHALL ENEMA !


    Brooklyn,Manhattan,Queens,Da Bronx, Staten Island.....
    NYC The Greatest Country in DA World....!

    "Our society is run by insane people for insane objectives.
    I think we're being run by maniacs for maniacal ends and I think I'm liable to be put away as insane for expressing that.
    That's what's insane about it."
    John Lennon

  15. #15

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Not sure why they went to A3 for so many of their new winds -- maybe it was the buzz word when they had the meeting that quarter and that's what stuck. I don't find them to be anything special and prefer A2s as well, for the most part. But then again, Gibson has been missing the mark with their pups for several decades now, hence the huge market for boutique stuff.
    .
    .
    My Mileage Does Not Vary

  16. #16
    Les Paul Forum Member Pat Boyack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Palace of the King
    Posts
    3,800

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by fakejake View Post
    Now if they'd only use long steel studs for the tailpieces....
    2016.

  17. #17
    Les Paul Forum Member Red Baron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    6,525

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by poon99 View Post
    Neck shape...any difference this year? Yes, less shoulder.

    Body carve....better this year? Yes.
    Has both of those points been officially stipulated or is it merely speculation?

  18. #18
    All Access/Backstage Pass poon99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rochester,NY
    Posts
    914

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by Red Baron View Post
    Has both of those points been officially stipulated or is it merely speculation?
    I own two 2013 R9s.
    Here is the Iced tea burst..

  19. #19
    Les Paul Forum Member MIKE20's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Reflectorland
    Posts
    7,624

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by poon99 View Post
    I own two 2013 R9s.
    Here is the Iced tea burst..



    Reflectorland is relocating to Rochester...

  20. #20

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by Pat Boyack View Post
    2016.
    We should start a pool as to what "refinements" 2014 will bring
    "Perhaps you have a vibrato that sounds like a goat
    trying to mount Diane Rehm as she conjures the
    ghost of Katherine Hepburn with a ouija board?"
    -David Von Bader

  21. #21
    Les Paul Forum Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2001
    Posts
    2,106

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    I've used many A3 magnets with great success in PAF types....not as hard and strident as an A5 or as compressed as an A2.

    I like A4 as well, matter of fact i mix and A2 in P-90s with very good results.

    Remember much depends on the amount of charge in any given magnet.

    The only A5 i like is a really weakened (or degaussed) version.

  22. #22
    Les Paul Forum Member Triburst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Way down yonder in... well, not quite THAT far...
    Posts
    3,830

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    If you're going to try to tweak your Burstbuckers, etc. with an A3, you might be in for a surprise. Many luthier supply shops send their A3 and A4 humbucker magnets completely degaussed (they have never been charged). You have to use a pair of strong neodymium magnets to put a charge on them. The good news is that you can actually tweak them using the same magnets while they're in your pickups mounted on your guitar.

  23. #23
    Les Paul Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    3,395

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    All of this info on A3 mags is appreciated, but what I'm still trying to figure out is why Gibson seems to be using them in the "clone" guitars so much, like the Page and Beano LP's. I'm thinking that in trying to replicate the sound of the original pickups, which probably had A5 or A2 originally, and A3 more closely replicates the sound of those vintage pickups after all these years of aging to the originals. Just something I noticed and wondered about.

    Al

  24. #24
    Les Paul Forum Member Red Baron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    6,525

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by zombiwoof View Post
    All of this info on A3 mags is appreciated, but what I'm still trying to figure out is why Gibson seems to be using them in the "clone" guitars so much, like the Page and Beano LP's. I'm thinking that in trying to replicate the sound of the original pickups, which probably had A5 or A2 originally, and A3 more closely replicates the sound of those vintage pickups after all these years of aging to the originals. Just something I noticed and wondered about.

    Al
    It's probably a case of "if all else fails, use A3" ...it's a great all-rounder.

  25. #25
    Les Paul Forum Member Red Baron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2004
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    6,525

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by poon99 View Post
    I own two 2013 R9s.
    Here is the Iced tea burst..
    So you can see a clear difference in top carve and neck shape from 2012 Historic's? ...the only reason I ask is because I've not seen any mention of top carve and neck shape being different in 2013.

  26. #26
    Les Paul Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Posts
    588

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by zombiwoof View Post
    All of this info on A3 mags is appreciated, but what I'm still trying to figure out is why Gibson seems to be using them in the "clone" guitars so much, like the Page and Beano LP's. I'm thinking that in trying to replicate the sound of the original pickups, which probably had A5 or A2 originally, and A3 more closely replicates the sound of those vintage pickups after all these years of aging to the originals. Just something I noticed and wondered about.

    Al
    - The definition of A2,A3,A5 were not cast in stone then and are not cast now.
    - Technology some 60 years ago was different - less 'precise' while making alloys for magnets ...

    So, it just might be the case that today's A3 is tonally closer to 50's A2 then today's A2.

    Also if the WIND on these has not changed from regular Burstbuckers to 'Custom' Bursbuckers (and the WIND is the key ingredient to any pickup's tone) - A3 can help in taming those nasty peaks in highs in bridge pickup and it also makes higher positions of unwound strings less thin sounding which happens when coils are unbalanced ... This was the good side.

    Now the other one - current A3 can not be charged/magnetized as much as A2 - so even if the overall tone of Custom Burstbucker might be closer to a good PAF it will not have dynamics and punch of a good PAF - kind of 'a bit warmer sounding T-Top' ...

    Too put it simply - if the regular Burstbucker's were described as too 'hot' for a PAF replica then Custom Burstbuckers will be not 'hot' enough for a PAF replica.

    But with all the positive changes that are happening at this moment (glue,trussrod etc) this one will also be perceived as a good one by most, although it is actually not positive - it is neutral. However, most of us got tired of listening selling and replacing BBs and since every change IS good, let's enjoy this one while honeymoon lasts ... and even the SD put an A3 in bridge of that Joe Bonamassa set ...

  27. #27
    Les Paul Forum Member bluesforstevie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Nellytown U. City MO
    Posts
    12,668

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Guys...what are the guitars officially called now? Gibson Les Paul and (whatever year they're copying) reissue....no custom shop or historic in the title?

    Is the nut still being made from the 6/6 nylon or whatever...it looks so white compared to when they first switched back to nylon...or does it?

    Also, the plastic looks like it has that pinkish hue again..is that just the photography?]

    Other than the A3 mags what other differences in the custom buckers? Materials, scattered wind, uneven coils ????
    "bereft of consciousness and self-awareness, yet ambulant and able to respond to surrounding stimuli."

  28. #28
    Les Paul Forum Member goldtop0's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    At the end of the Long White Cloud
    Posts
    6,151

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by bluesforstevie View Post

    Also, the plastic looks like it has that pinkish hue again..is that just the photography?


    Looks whiter to me looking at poon99's pics as above.

  29. #29
    Les Paul Forum Member jrr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2001
    Posts
    351

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by korus View Post
    - Too put it simply - if the regular Burstbucker's were described as too 'hot' for a PAF replica then Custom Burstbuckers will be not 'hot' enough for a PAF replica.

    But with all the positive changes that are happening at this moment (glue,trussrod etc) this one will also be perceived as a good one by most, although it is actually not positive - it is neutral. ...
    i'm not as worldly experienced as some here ..i have played a lester from one period or another consistently for,gasp,38 yrs..what you've said here is consistent with my 2010 R8.The BB's are too hot to be a PAF replica.But they sound great.I wouldn't change them for the world.Just have to back off the tone controls,particularly the mids and bass.Can't imagine a pickup paf replica thats weaker than original pafs ...imho,the changes are cool,i welcome them,and i will be hard pressed to hear a difference.I wouldn't trade my 2007 Warren Haynes 072 for a new 2013 "R",the wood on my WH is simply too good(as are the pups)....or my 2010 R8,for that matter.Hide glue neck joint and trussrod upgrade won't change the fact my 2 R8's are magnificent instruments.
    2011 R8 VOS Cherry SB. (8 1756)
    2010 R8 VOS Cherry SB. (8 0009)
    LP Standard,Black(1987)
    LP Standard,AntiqueSB(1989)
    LP Standard,Wine(1990)
    LP Custom,Cherry SB.(1989)
    Timbucker and Seth Lover pickups
    Thru Vintage 4-hole Hiwatt DR103's/504's
    Marshalls and Fender's
    ONLY NOS tubes:Mullard,Phillips,Amperex,RCA,
    Sylvania,Siemens,GE,Brimar,Tesla(70's)
    Martin HD28(2010)
    Martin HD28V(2010)

  30. #30
    Les Paul Forum Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Posts
    3,395

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    It seems to me that they are referring to the guitars as "Reissue" guitars now, and not Historic. I'm not positive, but that looks like what most sites are calling them.

    Al

  31. #31

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by Cogswell View Post
    Is is "hot hide glue", or just hide glue?
    "Hot" hide glue means nothing IMHO. It tells us nothing about the glue's strength, hardness, and creep properties. If they are using hot urea modified hide glue (for longer glue-up working times and longer pot life) then they would be better off using Titebond PVA. Urea modified hide glue is soft, and will creep like crazy. Similarly, but not as dramatically, if they are using too low of a gram weight glue (also for longer glue-up working time), then the hardness and strength of glue would also be compromised.

    But Gibson would never sacrifice true quality for the sake of better marketing bullets, would they? Well, maybe they ARE doing it right, but the "hot hide glue" spec doesn't tell us that.

    Class A, True Bypass, Hot Hide Glue... all marketing tools.

  32. #32
    Les Paul Forum Member fjminor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Between Nothingness and Eternity
    Posts
    3,519

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    For 2013 features, curious how Gibson "colors" the fretboard:

    "Also, the fretboard and body binding has been darkened color-wise for a more vintage-accurate look. "
    "The bitterness of poor quality remains
    long after low pricing is forgotten! "

  33. #33

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Stain 'em, no doubt.
    .
    .
    My Mileage Does Not Vary

  34. #34
    Les Paul Forum Member Pat Boyack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    The Palace of the King
    Posts
    3,800

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    Quote Originally Posted by zombiwoof View Post
    It seems to me that they are referring to the guitars as "Reissue" guitars now, and not Historic. I'm not positive, but that looks like what most sites are calling them.

    Al
    Shhhhhhh.......there are those who just can't admit it. Denial, you know......

  35. #35
    Les Paul Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,170

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    .
    Last edited by wizardmc; 03-18-13 at 02:18 PM.

  36. #36
    Les Paul Forum Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    2,170

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    .
    Last edited by wizardmc; 03-18-13 at 02:18 PM.

  37. #37
    Les Paul Forum Member cfljames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    northwest,connecticut
    Posts
    187

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    The music zoo just loaded up about a dozen 2013 Les Pauls for your viewing pleasure....

  38. #38

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    I really don't know what the words "historic" & "reissue" mean anymore.
    "Perhaps you have a vibrato that sounds like a goat
    trying to mount Diane Rehm as she conjures the
    ghost of Katherine Hepburn with a ouija board?"
    -David Von Bader

  39. #39

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    the worst part about this whole thing is how Gibson is advertising these new models with "1 Piece Boards!", where was this type of acknowledgment when they weren't 1 piece?!...very shady!

  40. #40
    Les Paul Forum Member Kim R's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2001
    Location
    Up where it's cold -
    Posts
    1,399

    Re: The New 2013 Les Paul Specs

    I just put this up on the "2012" thread but it should have been over here:

    Observations on 2013 R7 7 3037 at Wildwood:

    I had to stop by the store today and spent about an hour with the guitar listed above - mostly due to curiousity by some of the points raised here. Very unscientific observations:

    The tuners look very nice to me, both the button and the gear case. Yes, the very top of the capstan is slightly domed.

    The Gibson logo is in the same position as my own 2010 Hysteric, but it is made from darker, tinted material.

    The nut is made from the same nylon material as my 2010 and is the same color when viewed in person.

    As Slub has already posted, the fret board is nice and dark with the newer style "celluloid" (simulated celluloid??) material.

    The binding is slightly darker and is also painted with a darker coat of lacquer.

    The neck pickup is very clear and just slightly less hot than Custom Buckers on the Wildwood Spec guitars (slightly more subdued than the Wildwood Spec pickup when compared to the BurstBucker I).

    The bridge pickup is much more subdued than any PAF clone I've heard from Gibson and sounds absolutely glorious (seriously). It compresses with just average attack and blooms with that squish-splatt treble statement. If this is typical (don't have any idea), I think it's a landscape changer with regard to Gibson and their in-house pups.

    Neck angle is slightly more pronounced than my 2010. The strings clear the bridge pup frame by 1/8" with very low action. My 2010 is slightly more than half that with the exact same action height.

    The guitar was set up extremely well: Zero relief, treble-side clearance at 3/64 and bass at 4/64 (twelth fret). No buzz with big bends and stiff attack, all the way up to 22.

    Standard TOM, wireless ABR. The tail piece is held down by longer studs (3/16" longer than previous stock Gibson). The studs are still brass and I held a few new "extras" from Gibson Custom in my hand to compare. I was told that the steel anchors are also longer but did not see an example.

    To my eyes and in excellent flourescent light, the top carve looked the same as my 2010 model ('55 "refin"). My guitar is a gloss-burst and the new R7 is VOS'd which makes this comparison a little more challenging. Both guitars show a flatter pickup deck and a concave edge gully around the tail bouts when compared to years before 2009. I didn't measure any of this; it's all by visual comparison.

    The gold color is a tinge darker and definitely shows that greenish hue in the shadows. The back/neck color is also darker and IMO, much more attractive. 'Reminds me of an old piano.

    Pickup rings and pickguard are exactly the same color as those on my 2010.

    The "badge" on the pick guard is a paper/plastic sticker and it comes off. The badge on the selector plate (back) is metalic and stays on.

    The new Lifton-style brown case is better than an example from a decade ago but it still isn't good enough (latches). There is more padding around the edges and back panel.

    In general: A fantastic new LP! I'm not in the market - I don't collect and I have the right Les Paul already (2010 '55 Refin with wrapover). My guitar was slightly louder and a bit brighter than the 2013, but I'll avoid further comparisons due to their subjectivity.

    Oh: The neck did - without question - appear to be glued to the body of the guitar. It did not move, at all.
    ______________________

    K

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  


Scroll Down And Click On All Of Our Sponsors' Logos For Their Websites!